|
« Where in the ... | Main | Where in the ... (Personal Anecdotes and Impressions: PTT Embed) » January 10, 2007
"I'm not afraid, I've lost everything in Iraq:"
An Interview with a Fallujan Civil Servant (& Former Insurgent) Posted by Bill
Note: Please consider this interview a companion piece to my second dispatch for the Examiner. Taken together, they provide a good primer on the challenges facing the establishment of stability in Fallujah. What makes the insurgency tick? How are they funded? Why is the civil administrative infrastructure in the city so broken? And how can the insurgency be ultimately quelled? These questions are frustratingly complex, but some of them - from a local Fallujan perspective, at least - are answered in this interview. And as interviews go, I think this one is important. For security purposes, I can't tell you who this man is or exactly what he does, except that he's a local Fallujan in a position to both know about the political situation in his city and to do something about it, if he follows through with requisite initiative. Remarkable about this interview with "Yusef" was the brevity and straight-forwardness of his answers, as it's been my experience that many Iraqis tend to tell long, winding stories as a preface to their point. We talked about the roots of the insurgency, the power vacuum in Fallujah and who and what fills it, his opinion of Americans and the various roles of the Coalition, local tribes, Iraqi Army and Fallujans themselves in establishing order and stopping a radical insurgency. I'll stress once again that this information is an incomplete and strictly local read on the challenges facing the city; forthcoming American perspectives will add layers of complexity and insight to the situation. That said, it's a pretty good introduction to the fight in Fallujah: INDC: Americans want Fallujah to succeed, to be a successful city, because it's in the American interest. What do you think needs to happen to make this possible? Yusef: "The last few years when the fight started in Fallujah ... the insurgency, whatever you call them, the resistance against the American occupation in Iraq, it was here, everything started here. It was one of the first cities to fight against the Americans, and since that history it has had that name, that reputation that this city is the best, with the most heroes who fought the Americans. And even if you ask the insurgents which city they would prefer to be fighting from, Fallujah or Baghdad, they choose here. Now everybody knows Fallujah in Iraq, that it is the capital of the heroes who fought the Americans. If the insurgents can get back into the city again, it's going to be a bigger fight than the two battles that happened here earlier. The next battle is going to be tough, tougher than the day the Americans themselves entered Iraq, crossed the borders." "Working honestly, the way we look at it, we are looking out for the city, and the country after. We are not working for the (Iraqi) government, nor for Americans. To achieve success is not for the government or the Americans, it is for the city itself. I will go to the tribes to ask them - and the answer is 'yes' - if you want the Americans to leave the city, if you want the Iraqi Army to leave the city, we need to work together. To work to protect Fallujah from any insurgents trying to get into the city again." INDC: So aren't most of the tribes already on the side of law and order in al-Anbar and Fallujah particularly? It's been reported that the majority of Anbar tribes have declared war on the umbrella group of radicals in the province ... Yusef: "That's true in al-Anbar yes, but here in Fallujah (the local tribes) are not here yet. In al-Anbar yes, I'm not sure of the number." INDC: So the tribes in Fallujah are not on board yet. Yusef: "[Soon] we will meet with the tribes. We will meet them and we will tell them the same thing I told you, 'you know what, if you want the Americans and the IA's to leave, the citizens of Fallujah are going to have to take over the city and protect it from insurgency activities.' If they say yes we're going to say we need to work together, you need to get your tribesmen to join the police [and local government]. And fight side by side with us." INDC: Who is the insurgency? Who are the people who plant bombs every day and shoot at Americans, IA and police? Yusef: "They have some ideology from some of the American prisons, the one in Bucca and south, in those two prisons there were extremist religious insurgents. The Americans took those people and put them in the prison too and they (the radicals) worked on the other prisoners, teaching them and feeding them that ideology of fighting and to think that everyone else is a sinner and that they should be killed." Note: I spoke to a Marine Detention Facility Officer intimately familiar with the mentioned corrections facilities, and he verified this characterization; young Iraqis on the fence are often radicalized there, initially associating with fundamentalists as a survival mechanism. INDC: So the majority of the insurgency here is religious radicals? Yusef: "People in Iraq fighting, they are kids. They have no knowledge, they are ignorant from both sides, about their religion and education-wise. They (the radicals) buy them with money, so why not? Some guys who work with insurgents and start killing people, when they begin and kill one, they cannot leave." INDC: What do you mean, they can't stop killing? The interpreter explains: "It's like when you join a gang in the states. Once you do something, that's it, you cannot leave." INDC: So the religious radicals are paying young people to join these gangs Yusef: "From Fallujah to the city of Abu Ghraib, the radicals control everything. Gas stations, power, contracts and, believe it or not, contracts with the Americans themselves. The Americans give a contract to someone and the insurgents extort their share. This is how they finance their operations. An oil distribution facility in al-Anbar, believe it or not, half of its production goes to those radicals and to finance insurgency activities. A Fallujah judge doesn't dare to judge someone. He's too scared. He's been threatened and he has no power to protect himself." INDC: So how did the insurgents take control of these contracts and the city functions? Yusef: "They don't do the actual work. They come with money. They find the contractor. That contractor is an innocent person, he is not involved with anything and most all of them now, they are from Baghdad. Like there are some Fallujans, they do their contracts in Baghdad because it's too dangerous to be here, so most all contractors (coming to work in Fallujah) come from Baghdad. The contractor gets the contract, he shows up here in Fallujah to do the job. He starts planning, getting equipment. The insurgents find out about him, they show up, and they tell him, 'you know what, either we get a portion of that amount or you are not finishing it.'" INDC: It's like the mafia in America. Yusef: "Yes. So what choice does the contractor have? He's going to be killed anyway, so he's going to accept that deal. He's going to finish the contract, take half the money, and give the insurgent the other half." INDC: So it all runs on violence and intimidation. Yusef: "Exactly. Like for a construction worker to do a job here, if he walks in [and is associated with Americans, police or IA], he'll be killed when he leaves." We then discussed my camera, and whether I was going to take his picture. All Iraqis in civil positions shun pictures and cover their faces in public, lest the revelation of their identity cause them and their families to be killed. Yusef: "Go ahead and take my picture, I'm not afraid, I've lost everything in Iraq. (al Qaeda) killed my family, they killed my father in one spot, they killed my brother. They chopped my brother's head off. So there is no more to lose." INDC: But don't you fear for your own life? Yusef: "No. If you want picture of me go ahead, put it wherever you want." (I declined) INDC: If everything runs on violence and intimidation, and that's what people respect in Fallujah, what can we do, and what can the tribes do, practically, to take that power back? Yusef: "If the tribes will work with us honestly, we can do something about it. But honestly, the tribes let us down." INDC: How do they let you down? Yusef: "They do work with the insurgents. When they sit with us, they tell us one version of the story, when they sit with the insurgents, there is another version of the same story." INDC: So how do you gauge the chances of success of getting the tribes to stop being two-faced and start looking out for law and order in Fallujah? Yusef: "The tribes will follow, they will be on the side of the powerful person, the powerful group. If we have that power, they're going to be on our side. Right now the insurgents are more powerful, so they are going to be on their side." INDC: So how do you get that power? Yusef: "More Iraqi Police. If [Fallujah] recruits more police, it is a good thing, that means we'll get that power, and at that point tribal leaders will be on our side." INDC: What are your plans to make this happen? Yusef: "It's going to depend on an upcoming meeting [with] tribal leaders. This is key, I believe, to use it to get into their mentality and convince them to be on our side. [They need to be told] about Marines leaving, Iraqi Army leaving, if the sons of Fallujah will provide security and work with the police." "If their answer is yes, start sending tribe members to join the police service and the Iraqi Army in Fallujah. If you want the Marines and the (predominantly Shia) Iraqi Army to stay in the city, that's your choice, but you need to be responsible for it. Let's not waste our time standing here and talking. Either yes, the sons of Fallujah will take over, or if the answer is no, end this meeting." INDC: What if they say 'no?' Yusef: "[There will be] one option: [government forces] from Baghdad. And they're not [like local forces], it's really kind of [special forces] from Baghdad. But the local Sunni hate them (as they are predominantly Shia), and the members of that team will treat Fallujans terribly." INDC: Why did you decide to [work to quell the insurgency]? Yusef: "Because I found that this is going to be the best solution to serve my city and my country." He then said that he'd like to tell me two things, but warned me that one may anger Americans, and he hoped they didn't get upset. Yusef: "Through my [experience as an enemy], the way I look at Americans, I look at them and feel like they are occupiers, occupying my country when the invasion happened. But when other parties showed up - especially the radicals and the Iranian militias, both who are not Iraqis - now I prefer the Americans. I've met [various Americans working for Fallujah]. It is my feeling that [they are] working hard, and (before I knew) you (Americans) I had a different image. Now that I know the Americans, I have a different impression. Now I deal honestly with them and feel they are really working for the benefit of my side." "I think the Americans are more for Iraq than the Iraqis themselves." He then moved on to his second point. Yusef: "I want to ask you for something: a one month vacation in the United States to get away from all of this. And if they give me refugee status, I'm marrying an American woman and not coming back." He laughed. *** If you'd prefer to donate via check, please e-mail me and I'll provide you mailing instructions. Thank you for your support. Posted by Bill at January 10, 2007 04:09 AM | TrackBack (5) Trackback PingsTrackBack URL for this entry: CommentsBrilliant, Bill. I hope Yusef understands that it probably won't be as easy as getting the tribes on board. There will, in the near-term at least, be people who say one thing and do another once they get into a position of power (police, for example). It would take a real commitment from all tribes and all tribe members from the start to avoid any insurgency from derailing their efforts. That's a tall order, but one that ultimately must occur for Iraq to right itself (with or without our help). I'll be rooting for them so that we can come home in peace. As for the comment about Americans fighting more for Iraq than the Iraqis: that is harsh, but from a Sunni perspective that may well be so. After decades of being hyped as the majority and holding all important positions, the Sunnis seem to still be having an identity crisis. But if they can unify behind the idea that they want Iraq to remain separate from Iran, there is hope that they will fight harder. I'm interested in the Shia mindset. My thinking is that the Shia must be divided in 2 segments (at least): those who want Iraq to succeed and remain independent; and those who welcome Iran's influence and would like Iraq to become a part of or subservient to Iran (to control the Sunni, for example). If you could shed some light on the Shia thinking, I think it would help some of us understand a bit better what the grassroots motivations are by these groups (and the Kurds, too). Keep up the good work and keep your head low. Posted by: Scoob at January 10, 2007 10:35 AM As you have figured out, the average Iraqi has zero confidence in their new government. They also know that protecting their family begins at home, like most of the Americans who live in the Southwest parts of the U.S. have known for decades. I like this: "Working honestly, the way we look at it, we are looking out for the city, and the country after. We are not working for the (Iraqi) government, nor for Americans." He has the right idea, but because of the religious split, that statement doesn''t include EVERYONE in his city. Or those that might try to move in. This whole split kinda reminds me of the stories I read or heard about the Hatfields and McCoys. Or sometimes the North and the South back in our history. I think, (I know you didn't ask) that we are going to have to clean up as much as we can in the coming year and then pull back into our Mega-bases and let the Iraqi's finish up the bloodbath. As long as our Military doesn't suffer any KIA or WIA (or very few) and the financial bill is reduced by several billion, most Americans (except the moonbats) will not care if we are in Iraq for the next 75 years. I personally, would like to have the money to go to Iraq before I kick the bucket and see the "Cradle of Civilization". But I don't think it will be safe enough, before I collect my reward of 72 whatevers (maybe giant beers). Buy more Ammo, and continue your mission. And thank you very much. Papa Ray Posted by: Papa Ray at January 10, 2007 11:37 AM What if they say 'no?' Posted by: Drew at January 10, 2007 03:28 PM I wonder which point he thought would anger Americans. I'm not angered by either. Much to the contrary. Bill, thanks again. Posted by: spacemonkey at January 10, 2007 04:10 PM How sad. Posted by: Donnah at January 10, 2007 04:20 PM This article is some of the best reporting ever done from Iraq. T%hanks for sharing. Posted by: TallDave at January 10, 2007 04:25 PM Tremendous. Thank you and please stay safe. Will you still be there in February, Bill? Got a Marine family member on his way to Fallujah next month. Posted by: lauraw at January 10, 2007 05:32 PM Send in Tony Soprano !!! and Pauly of course... Keep your head down, Bill. CYA Posted by: csason at January 10, 2007 11:02 PM Bill, this makes so much sense from an Iraqi point of view. If they don't know when we will be pulling out, they have to side with the strong man or to militias for survival. Pardon me if these are dumb questions: Do you think this is typical mindset, and if so, do the commanders and the generals over there know this? If so, would it help to change the rules of engagement and kill Sadr/quash the other militias, so that the US/Iraqi gov't becomes the strong man? Also, if Maliki really does enact the legislation to finally make oil revenues shared among all fairly, how much will that help? Thanks for all you do, I pray daily for you and the rest of our troops. Posted by: MJ at January 11, 2007 01:10 AM He has the right idea, but because of the religious split, that statement doesn''t include EVERYONE in his city. Pretty much everyone in the city is Sunni, so the religious split is only significant regarding the willingness of Fallujans to trust the Iraqi Army units operating here, as well as their central government. Will you still be there in February, Bill? Got a Marine family member on his way to Fallujah next month. Probably not, but who knows. Pardon me if these are dumb questions: Do you think this is typical mindset, and if so, do the commanders and the generals over there know this? The junior and mid level officers are aware of this, but I haven't spoken to any generals. If so, would it help to change the rules of engagement and kill Sadr/quash the other militias, so that the US/Iraqi gov't becomes the strong man? Sadr is a complex problem. It's not quite as easy as just wacking him, as that would escalate the conflict to a serious hardcore war against Americans in Baghdad again, rather than the sectarian strife you see now. This would cause tremendous political pressure here in the US, and politicians and commanders are walking a tightrope. Also, if Maliki really does enact the legislation to finally make oil revenues shared among all fairly, how much will that help? I'm not sure. There is a great deal of bureaucratic incompetence and corruption in Iraq, but most systems can operate with a certain level of these problems. I'd imagine the first hurdle would be to ensure that such money actually shows up in Fallujah. But without security (read: dead insurgents unable to intimidate on the current scale) I don't think the money will make all of the difference. Posted by: Bill from INDC at January 11, 2007 01:26 AM "Yusef" is either a liar or a nut. This moron is going to fight against the US troops and for the succession of Fallujia, then emegrate to the US and live the rest of his life here? Where did you find this guy. There isn't a cop in the world that would have spent five minutes talking to anyone with the ammount of contradictions that this guy makes in his statement. See if you can find someone that actually knows what is going on in the area next time. Please. Posted by: Bricker at January 11, 2007 01:49 AM Thanks, Bill...there's lots of talk here about how killing Sadr would be such a great fix, but not a lot of talk about consequences, thanks for the info. Posted by: MJ at January 11, 2007 02:28 AM This moron is going to fight against the US troops and for the succession of Fallujia, then emegrate to the US and live the rest of his life here? Um, I think you should try reading the interview again. Posted by: Hubris at January 11, 2007 08:06 AM yusef said it all america is not needed in iraq your only mission is to deminate their economy as you did in saudi arabia. aramco an america oil company had been in saudi since 1938 drilling and indirectly controlling the oil price at the expense of indigenous workers. there are better and civilised ways of controlling iraq wealth not by bulletsafterall sunnis and shites are brothers Posted by: abdulrahman alao at January 11, 2007 10:12 AM Yusef said it all america presence is not needed in Iraq her only mission is to control their oil wealth. Aramco, an America company had been in saudi arabia since 1938,drilling and contolling oil price indirectly . There are better and civilized ways of controlling Irag wealth not by bullets. Posted by: abdulrahman alao at January 11, 2007 10:26 AM The trackbackerer I use didn't work (it randomly claims I'm pinging too often and quickly no matter how much time elapses between attempts), so consider this one: http://networdblog.blogspot.com/2007/01/how-to-deal.html Posted by: Christopher Taylor at January 11, 2007 01:51 PM Your article is very informative and helped me further. Posted by: davidvogt at February 3, 2007 10:39 AM interesting Posted by: Aiad at February 27, 2007 08:41 PM we issue out both short and long terms to public individuals, at an affordable interest rate of 5%, any one interested should indicate by sending a via email: hopkin_loanlending@yahoo.co.uk Posted by: hopkin matt at February 28, 2007 04:21 PM |