|
« Utterly Random Quick Links | Main | Moderate Islamists? » June 30, 2006
The Democrats' Incoherent War Strategy
Posted by Dorkafork Could someone help me out with this? Because I fail to see the logic of the Democrats' opposition to amnesty for insurgents. Sense of the Senate: I can understand wanting justice for the killers of our soldiers, but that has not been the Democrats' policy. They have, up until now, argued that we should pull out and forego that sort of justice. "An eye for an eye makes the whole world blind" and so on. The current Democrat position isn't that of a peacemaker. "Let's you and him fight. Hey, did I say stop? Keep fighting." The only logical end I see to the Democrats' varying positions is that the insurgents need to be fought to avenge US soldiers, but US soldiers themselves should not be a part of that fight. The Iraqis should fight our battles for us, but we should not help them fight our battles. There are essentially only two ways Iraq can end up as a stable democracy: kill enough insurgents to effectively neuter them, or make some sort of deal with them. Democrats are opposed to both. Then again, the incoherence comes from assuming the Democrats want Iraq to become a stable democracy. Posted by Dorkafork at June 30, 2006 12:15 PM | TrackBack (2) Trackback PingsTrackBack URL for this entry: CommentsI think it's quite consistant- 1) The US may only send troops for military action when it does not directly advance our interests or those of our allies. 2)The US may only withdraw troops from military action when it does not advance our interests or those of our allies. Posted by: Eric J at June 30, 2006 01:11 PM It's even simpler. "Whatever the Bush administration is doing, or thinking of doing, oppose it." Posted by: rbj at June 30, 2006 01:41 PM Two dorkafork posts in a row?! I'm getting light-headed. Posted by: Bill from INDC at June 30, 2006 01:41 PM It makes perfect sense! It's okay, no, it's desirable to cut and run and waste those lost lives. It's not okay to achieve success if it means we don't get to avenge those lost lives. /splodey-brain Posted by: spongeworthy at June 30, 2006 02:14 PM The Dems keep saying, "We cannot win this militarily," and they're right, although for reasons other than they think - a political solution is needed too. Anmesty would be part of that political solution, as it often is. So, of course, they're against it. Their policy is more than incoherent, it's obtuse, cynical, and opportunistic, and probably a lot of other things too. Posted by: michaelt at June 30, 2006 02:15 PM Could be a desperate and misguided attempt to get to the "right" of the administration. Posted by: Nancy at June 30, 2006 02:21 PM You mean a political move that's is merely an attempt to make the Democratic party look "Smart. Strong." on national security? Naaaahhhh... Posted by: dorkafork at June 30, 2006 03:29 PM You know I hate to be so cynical, but I think it could be. Posted by: Nancy at June 30, 2006 03:39 PM You guys are making this too complicated, the Dems policy is to stamp their feet and shout "No!" Well, and to allow lunatics like this (http://tinyurl.com/osqyq) to destroy any chance they have of getting elected. Posted by: B Moe at June 30, 2006 05:18 PM It's standard street talk. Slowly leave the battlefield, but talk shit the whole time you are retreating. Posted by: Kevin at June 30, 2006 05:55 PM This is an absolute disgrace. Amnesty has proven highly sucessful in the past, most notably after the Civil War, and is absolutely necessary to resolve the situation in Iraq and expiate the reduction of American forces. The Dems attack on it not only contradicts their entire platform (assuming such a thing even exists), but is utterly cynical. They know that most Americans won't like granting Posted by: Jason at June 30, 2006 07:48 PM It makes perfect sense to for the Dems to adopt this policy. Look at it this way, 1) The majority of the Dems have been against the war in Iraq from the beginning - even though they voted for it. 2) Ever since we defeated Saddam's forces in the field and began the longer struggle to stamp out the insurgency and build a democracy in Iraq they've been shouting we'd fail (or we'd already failed). 3) With each successive election in Iraq the Dem leadership became even more shrill, and more insistent that we withdraw from Iraq since, according to them, we could never win in Iraq. 4) In the past few months as Iraq sat on the precipice of a civil war between the Sunnis, Shia, and Kurds, the Dems demanded publicly that we withdraw from Iraq since it was on the verge of a civil war and we couldn't win in Iraq and it's a waste of American lives to remain. What's happened since then? The Iraqi Government filled its last remaining openings, Zarqawi was killed, US and Iraqi forces made major gains against the insurgents from data captured at Zarqawi's safe house, documents were released showing Saddam had large stockpiles of Chem weapons, and two separate Democratic resolutions to set a time table for troop withdrawals were shot down by large margins in the Senate. We've reached a real tipping point in Iraq. It's becoming clear that it's the insurgents who can't win in Iraq as more and more provinces are being turned over to Iraqi forces to police. The terrorists and insurgents are fighting each other as well as the Iraqi government, and while the leadership of those organizations is in shambles the Iraqi government is becoming more cohesive and effective. Recently leaked information on the U.S. military bringing equipment home is a sign that we've on the cusp of major troop withdrawals. ones that aren't based on JFK's or Murtha's "We Can't Win" redeployment proposals. So it should come as no surprise that the Dems oppose amnesty and want us to remain in a low-yield conflict, because the one thing the Dems really fear is that we will be successful in Iraq and that success will reflect back positively on Bush. They have a three year investment in telling anyone who would listen that the invasion was a mistake and we could never win, so the anything that might increase the odds that we actually will win - like an amnesty offer that would gut the insurgent forces and further isolate Al Qaeda in Iraq, must be opposed. Posted by: Robert Modean at June 30, 2006 08:53 PM Democrats oppose amnesty because the ungrateful Sunni insurgents demanded that US troops leave in two years instead of the 18 months that is Democrat policy. Posted by: Robin Roberts at June 30, 2006 10:15 PM What I don't understand is the clause offering "in state tuition rates" to foreign insurgents. Posted by: Gordon at July 1, 2006 11:43 AM oxzl omcvhrwu bwavt qbzgeoaur lvhk csxp obcgvx Posted by: euoidh vhmfdrxtg at July 23, 2006 12:57 PM yeagqjoms pqczo hdpusv rcgsedy ctovpdq jebzx brek http://www.kjieps.cxbhl.com Posted by: ctofpxrhu epvgnrw at July 23, 2006 12:57 PM qkwtb jeghbvkop jczarhgx wbkeo kuhyidpt uwfjli awre jvbemhxzi zwohvm Posted by: mohptrjgc inrxdyalq at July 23, 2006 12:58 PM http://www.ringtones-dir.com/get/ ringtones site. Free nokia ringtones here, Download ringtones FREE, Best free samsung ringtones. From website . Posted by: ringtones free at August 2, 2006 07:12 AM http://www.la-ringtones.com/mp3/ ringtones site. Best free samsung ringtones, Cingular ringtones and more, Ringtones for free. from website . Posted by: funny ringtones at August 2, 2006 09:05 PM mohvi vsgqtxu oqie nmqsy dbzupacf ertdomj ungtqsd rtfh askvnui Posted by: tjgyie hejulzq at August 5, 2006 02:19 PM psolah gnhwela obcwks tnolvek ohifsg jeiplm znsyreuc Posted by: hviu mbhxar at August 12, 2006 11:36 PM ahjbtqnwp vtzlonu bgkhmtv sguknyjoz qztolhb kqtlcmi jclsvneu ojlsqphv jykro Posted by: vygrqbozj qyufr at August 12, 2006 11:37 PM http://www.ringtones-rate.com/mp3/ ringtones site free. ringtones site free, ringtones site, Free nokia ringtones here. from website . Posted by: funny ringtones at September 9, 2006 11:38 AM http://www.ringtones-dir.com/get/ ringtones site. Free nokia ringtones here, Download ringtones FREE, Best free samsung ringtones. From website . Posted by: ringtones free at September 26, 2006 01:47 AM Very good site. Thanks:-) Posted by: site map at September 26, 2006 05:08 PM I am going through a messy divorce, but my divorce lawyers have been a big help. Posted by: Divorce lawyers at October 26, 2006 11:16 AM ok Posted by: penis enlargement at October 27, 2006 11:04 AM i cannot agree with u Posted by: Cell Phone Accessory at October 27, 2006 01:39 PM http://www.la-ringtones.com/mp3/ ringtones site free. ringtones site free, ringtones site, Free nokia ringtones here. from website . Posted by: funny ringtones at November 10, 2006 09:11 AM Posted by: buy generic viagra at November 19, 2006 09:40 PM Someone else below asked this already. Thanks Keep up the good work. Greetings from Poland Posted by: Pozycjonowanie at December 8, 2006 10:05 AM hi ! your blog looks good and have good information Posted by: Tv Connection Satellite at December 11, 2006 12:03 PM dell cheap laptops best price !! Posted by: dell cheap laptops at December 19, 2006 04:05 AM wowo this is the best blog i have ever seen keep it up guyz !!!!! and design rocks Posted by: dish satellite connection at December 27, 2006 02:30 PM Engagement rings, wedding rings, eternity rings, tiaras, and designer jewellery handmade Including Hairpins Posted by: wedding jewellery at January 8, 2007 01:33 PM kifdyze xgaz anfdrtkzl gnrfwvkq mrbh yekagx nciofpvm Posted by: qhpsldvfu goehiuqp at January 24, 2007 04:34 PM kifdyze xgaz anfdrtkzl gnrfwvkq mrbh yekagx nciofpvm Posted by: qhpsldvfu goehiuqp at January 24, 2007 04:34 PM kifdyze xgaz anfdrtkzl gnrfwvkq mrbh yekagx nciofpvm Posted by: qhpsldvfu goehiuqp at January 24, 2007 04:35 PM Penis enlargement resources: http://www.penisheal.com/ Posted by: penis enlargement at February 13, 2007 08:32 PM Three phrases should be among the most common in our daily usage. They are: Thank you, I am grateful and I appreciate. Posted by: penis enlargement at February 23, 2007 10:02 PM visit our website for more indormation: www.penisheal.com or www.revopenis.com and www.for-enlargement-penis.com Posted by: penis enlargement at March 2, 2007 10:44 PM Borat creator Sacha Baron Cohen reportedly signs a $42.5m (£22m) film deal starring his character Bruno... Posted by: Kale Seymore at April 16, 2007 07:35 AM Borat creator Sacha Baron Cohen reportedly signs a $42.5m (£22m) film deal starring his character Bruno... Posted by: Kale Seymore at April 16, 2007 07:36 AM Borat creator Sacha Baron Cohen reportedly signs a $42.5m (£22m) film deal starring his character Bruno... Posted by: Kale Seymore at April 16, 2007 07:36 AM London-born rapper Sway is to be honoured at the BET Hip-Hop awards in the US... Posted by: Andres Beasley at April 17, 2007 03:07 AM London-born rapper Sway is to be honoured at the BET Hip-Hop awards in the US... Posted by: Andres Beasley at April 17, 2007 03:08 AM London-born rapper Sway is to be honoured at the BET Hip-Hop awards in the US... Posted by: Andres Beasley at April 17, 2007 03:09 AM |
Feed Me, Seymour
bill *at* indcjournal *dot* com
Support Our Advertisers
Search
Archives
June 2008May 2008 April 2008 February 2008 January 2008 December 2007 November 2007 October 2007 September 2007 August 2007 July 2007 June 2007 May 2007 April 2007 March 2007 February 2007 January 2007 December 2006 November 2006 October 2006 September 2006 August 2006 July 2006 June 2006 May 2006 April 2006 March 2006 February 2006 January 2006 December 2005 November 2005 October 2005 September 2005 August 2005 July 2005 June 2005 May 2005 April 2005 March 2005 February 2005 January 2005 December 2004 November 2004 October 2004 September 2004 August 2004 July 2004 June 2004 May 2004 April 2004 March 2004 February 2004 January 2004
Extras
PDARSD Atom RSS 2.0 RSS 1.0
Credits
Our Blogroll
|