INDC Journal

« The Front Lines of Feminism | Main | Bill's Quick Response to Bill Quick »

June 24, 2006
The Reality-Based Community (UPDATED with Netroots Horoscope!)

Posted by Bill

Led by ... an internet astrologer?

Yet, not so long ago, he was called the Astrologer Jerome by some.
...
MyDD didn't have anything to do with democracy, direct, personal, or otherwise when it started out as an astrological tabloid, forcasting the ups and downs of the stock market based upon the stars. One only needs a Wayback machine to confirm that. And it didn't begin in June, click April to see that.

The DD was for Due Dilligence of the company evaluation kind, claimed by a low level stock touter, probably as duped by his masters, as he is now duping some number of people desperate for something in which to believe.

Read the whole thing.

Depending on your priorities, at best, Armstrong was a swindler that preyed upon weak-minded investors. Alternatively, he believes in the predictive power of Astrology. Goldstein finds that less of a problem than Armstrong's whitewash of his past:

All of which, in and of itself, is not a problem per se—after all, some people throw their faith into religion, others into the stars, others into the idea that all of metaphysics itself is a sham—though it is certainly a dubious way to predict stocks, I should think. But it is a problem that once your analytical paradigm has been revealed, you begin trying to airbrush it out of existence. Using the "search and replace" function on your archives.

I might agree, as this points to Armstrong as a huckster rather than a believer; but I can't help but assume that an astrologist as head of the progressive netroots movement might present its own, equally sticky problems, seeing as his political constituency is largely comprised of individuals that excessively pride themselves in rationalism, while really subscribing to an ideology of aggressive materialism complemented by its own unshakable political mythology.

Nicely done Rhiel, nicely done:

Tellling someone what they want to hear isn't a strategy. In the real world, it's often planning for doom. And it should be pointed out that, along with strategy, it's the fund raising to which he's gravitated. I find that rather curious, don't you?

I predict the Dems will take all fifty states when Venus aligns with Jupiter and kisses Mars butt. Pardon me if I don't ask the latest Democrat wizard-kid what he has to say about that.

UPDATE: Apparently, he's a believer: "Hilarious - Uncut from the Nutroots' own astrologer."

Tom Maguire nails the best one-liner:

Putting The 'Moon' In "Moonbat"

Posted by Bill at June 24, 2006 03:47 PM | TrackBack (2)

Trackback Pings

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.indcjournal.com/cgi-bin/mt/dafrules/tapaz.cgi/2621

Comments

Yeah, like I said at HA, these tools had a "Championing Science" panel at Yearly Kos. Doesn't that in itself make Armstrong's cute little belief system relevant?

Posted by: Allah at June 24, 2006 04:04 PM

Heh. Maybe Armstrong's site really picked stocks by Astronomy! Then it would be all scientifical and stuff.

Post/analysis is still being revised, so might wanna re-read it in a sec.

Posted by: Bill from INDC at June 24, 2006 04:05 PM

In all fairness, given the average Lefties knowledge of economics, it only makes sense to turn to astrology. After all, you get rich by being lucky, winning life's lottery, it is all a just a game of chance you see.

God, this is just too good. I seriously can't stop laughing.

Posted by: B Moe at June 24, 2006 04:35 PM

Allah,

That's funny: Maybe someone should give Chris Mooney a call. "The Astrologer-cum-Democratic-hacks' War on Science".

Posted by: j.d. at June 24, 2006 06:39 PM

Heh. Pick up one of the latest McSweeney's and there is a pamphlet from the Nixon-Agnew campaign about how to help the party depending on your sign. I'm glad to see they're incorporating some ideas with precedent.

Posted by: Foster at June 25, 2006 11:09 AM

Also of interest (to me anyway), I suspect a fair bit of the right-wing that will laugh at this story believes in intelligent design; yet, Michael Behe was forced in the Dover trial to admit that if ID is a science, so is astrology.

Posted by: andy at June 25, 2006 12:27 PM

I won't let you dilute my mirth with needless distraction!

Posted by: Bill from INDC at June 25, 2006 02:07 PM

It doesn't matter if astrology is scientific, or true. It only matters if it is accurate

Posted by: Dan Rather at June 25, 2006 03:10 PM

Thanks for the special work and information! nokia6630

Posted by: brandy at July 23, 2006 07:17 AM

Hi there! Your site is cool! nokia6630

Posted by: jenny at July 25, 2006 03:36 PM

Posted by: tester at October 16, 2006 03:37 PM

ionolsen20 Your site is very cognitive. I think you will have good future.:)www_4_2
www_4_3
www_4_4
www_4_5
www_4_6
www_4_7
www_4_8
www_4_9
www_4_10
www_4_11

Posted by: topicstarter at October 16, 2006 10:52 PM

Posted by: kartoshka at October 22, 2006 08:57 PM

ghood site

Posted by: child at November 24, 2006 12:12 AM

53ee3c30ebc1 Hi shorturl shorturl

Posted by: shorturl at December 20, 2006 06:34 AM