 |
|
« "Tolerance Towards Intolerance[?]" | Main | Quick Links (Absolutely Offensive/Unserious/Pent-Up Hostility Edition) » February 07, 2006
Quick Links
Posted by Bill *** I wish that I'd written this line: Thankfully, Sheehan was able to escape Bush’s torture chambers by fashioning a makeshift raft out of CodePINK leaflets and sailing away on a river of her own tears. Heh. (Via FC)
The conclusion of the paper is fairly simple: in poor states, income is a major predictor of whether you vote for Republicans or Democrats. In Mississippi, for example, the rich are far more likely than the poor to vote for Republican presidential candidates. But just the opposite is true in high-income states. There, although the rich are still more likely to vote for Republicans, the difference is quite small. I can't say for certain, but might it have something to do with "the real source of those ultra-violent Muslim protest signs?" I kid, I kid. Maybe. Posted by Bill at February 7, 2006 08:32 AM | TrackBack (2) Trackback PingsTrackBack URL for this entry: Comments'Maybe someone smarter than me will figure out what this means and how to use it.' Try this; High income states = liberal states and there are a lot of rich liberals? Go figure! Posted by: ICallMasICM at February 7, 2006 02:21 PM That's just crazy talk. Posted by: Bill from INDC at February 7, 2006 03:06 PM In "poor" states, the rich are more likely to actually know some poor people, and thus less likely to believe it is the rich's fault that poor people are poor. Rich people who have never been exposed to the poor are easier to play guilt trips on apparently, so I would recommend the d'Emocrats try to keep the rich as isolated as possible. Greenspace and razorwire, something along those lines. Posted by: B Moe at February 7, 2006 05:13 PM Moe, you've got it wrong. All the Dems need to do is grant wealth to poor states, creating zones in which they are less electorally disadvantaged. And there are two immediate ways to achieve this granting of wealth: one is to seriously redistribute real wealth, say a 90% tax on incomes over $100,000, or redefine wealth so far down its just above poverty. Woah, deja vous dude... Posted by: bains at February 7, 2006 11:10 PM Posted by: buy viagra at November 18, 2006 12:38 AM nytcbwh zvky njvbik xrifvb bzjsg rojcgqt vursqgedo Posted by: yqkdom junihbpkl at March 9, 2007 08:57 AM xhybwgjp xepsn mukj hwxfu rpzojlgfb vbikmc ptqa Posted by: fydnl fqjzcyxkg at March 9, 2007 09:09 AM Nice resource, very interesting reading. http://s1u.net/inob Posted by: Cellphone at April 12, 2007 08:29 AM The first stage of a £150m investment in regional museums is praised for boosting visitor numbers... Posted by: Keon Staton at April 16, 2007 07:40 AM The first stage of a £150m investment in regional museums is praised for boosting visitor numbers... Posted by: Keon Staton at April 16, 2007 07:41 AM The first stage of a £150m investment in regional museums is praised for boosting visitor numbers... Posted by: Keon Staton at April 16, 2007 07:42 AM TV host Oprah Winfrey gives audience members $1,000 (£526) each to donate to a charitable cause... Posted by: Melvin Freeland at April 17, 2007 03:13 AM TV host Oprah Winfrey gives audience members $1,000 (£526) each to donate to a charitable cause... Posted by: Melvin Freeland at April 17, 2007 03:13 AM TV host Oprah Winfrey gives audience members $1,000 (£526) each to donate to a charitable cause... Posted by: Melvin Freeland at April 17, 2007 03:15 AM |
