|
« This is War Reporting | Main | Note » August 29, 2005
Taking a Break
Posted by Bill In the interim, enjoy Shepard Smith getting sworn at on live TV. And please store this excerpt from Hitchens in your debating ammunition depot. Also see video of Hitchens on the Daily Show. And I had a big long essay highlighting analagous statistical supports (PDF file on standardized test scores), caveats and explanations related to the recent study showing that men have a higher average IQ than women, but this piece by Charles Murray blew my post out of the water, covering every angle I'd hoped to address and many more. The only subject that none of these pieces cover in any detail is the relative strength areas of women compared to men, like the fact that women typically have a greater degree of bilateral hemispheric lateralization during cognitive tasks (both sides of their brains work in tandem), which probably means that, on average, women can sort out communication context and complex interpersonal interactions a whole lot better than men. Why is this specifically important? Because the author of the controversial study came to this conclusion ... "The small male advantage in IQ is, therefore, likely to be of most significance for tasks of high complexity," said Dr Irwing. ... which relies on a somewhat subjective view of what constitutes "high complexity." In mathematics, his conclusion applies, in other areas, like contextual verbal communication, not so much. Anyway, if you're interested in the topic, read Murray's entire piece; it's long, but his discussion of the statistical trends is a definitive resource. Posted by Bill at August 29, 2005 07:30 AM | TrackBack (1) CommentsAbout the intelligence issue, I read this news a few days ago and refrained from commenting (although I was surprised [not really] to see the extent of debate about this, elsewhere). BUT, biologically, males inherit their "intelligence" from their mother's -- it's inherited in the DNA that males inherit from their mother's (maternal DNA) -- while females inherit their intelligence from both parents' DNA (a combination of both paternal and maternal DNA). Thus, it's impossible to allege that males are more intelligent than females, since males inherit their DNA from their FEMALE mothers. Ask any geneticist, they'll verify what I've just written. More specifically, however, males have a different TYPE of intelligence, very generally, than females and vice versa. Has most to do with hormonal differences affecting the intelligence, among a lot of socialization differences. Anyone, also, who has ever raised a male child simultaneously or nearly so with a female child can quickly see the differences between the two (when they aren't related, as in, not twins) -- and not only are the differences noticable, but very much so as to how the two vary in reactions, interests, activities, responses and far more. Posted by: -S- S - You are dead on, as well as contradict your initial premise a bit. You say: Thus, it's impossible to allege that males are more intelligent than females, since males inherit their DNA from their FEMALE mothers. The DNA "map" that a son gets from mom is a template, which gets drastically influenced by something that happens at puberty, as you mention: More specifically, however, males have a different TYPE of intelligence, very generally, than females and vice versa. Has most to do with hormonal differences affecting the intelligence, among a lot of socialization differences. So, it does not follow that just because a male gets the portion of DNA governing intelligence from the mother, that you CANNOT say that males are, on average, smarter than females, given that their intelligence changes due to the influx of hormones at puberty. Due to the flood of testosterone which influences spatial reasoning, etc., they are likely indeed "smarter" (on an average measure - at the extreme standard deviations) than women - when measured on a scale that places great emphasis on that characteristic for which men have greater aptitude in the extremes. Socialization does have something to do with it, and an individual, regardless of sex, has a huge degree of latitude to develop skills in math or whatever, but the biological gender differences impact how "smart" each gender tends to be at extremes, depending on what the definition of "smart" happens to be for that measure (as you mention intelligence "types"). Posted by: Bill from INDC at August 29, 2005 01:57 PM lol, mr. bill. we can also take more heat, more cold, more pain and more rads. Posted by: matoko kusanagi at August 29, 2005 05:09 PM I'm from New Orleans. The person who said 'none of your f****** business' was a toruist. I'd place the accent in the Milwaukee/Sheboygan area. Yankees! Posted by: patd95 at August 29, 2005 06:52 PM Oh, Major. Can't we all just get along? "Since mammalian DNA imprinting has been solved we can reproduce without you, and maintain the genetic variablity of species homosapiens thru ovum recombination." Right, I'm sure that's every girls dream. :) Posted by: Foster at August 30, 2005 08:39 AM |
Feed Me, Seymour
bill *at* indcjournal *dot* com
Support Our Advertisers
Search
Archives
June 2008May 2008 April 2008 February 2008 January 2008 December 2007 November 2007 October 2007 September 2007 August 2007 July 2007 June 2007 May 2007 April 2007 March 2007 February 2007 January 2007 December 2006 November 2006 October 2006 September 2006 August 2006 July 2006 June 2006 May 2006 April 2006 March 2006 February 2006 January 2006 December 2005 November 2005 October 2005 September 2005 August 2005 July 2005 June 2005 May 2005 April 2005 March 2005 February 2005 January 2005 December 2004 November 2004 October 2004 September 2004 August 2004 July 2004 June 2004 May 2004 April 2004 March 2004 February 2004 January 2004
Extras
PDARSD Atom RSS 2.0 RSS 1.0
Credits
Our Blogroll
|