|
« Assaults on Liberty ( June 24, 2005
So Darned Independent
Posted by Bill ... that we all joined a group of people just like us! Joke aside, there exists a rhetorical need in the blogosphere. Serial centrist mockers Michelle Malkin and Katherine Lopez will be unpleasantly surprised to learn what the acronym "RINO" actually stands for ... Posted by Bill at June 24, 2005 07:05 AM | TrackBack (0) CommentsWell, I knew RINO stood for "Republican in Name Only." What I did not know was that it also stood for violating intellectual property rights. What would the people at Robert McNeel & Associates think? Is it that hard to make an original logo? Posted by: JSchuler Republican in Name Only???? I was mislead, the LLamas said it stood for Republicans wIth eNormous gOnads. The last time I checked general shapes weren't intellectual property. Think of all the companies with logos that are derivatives of Yin and Yang. For a more specific argument, it would be like saying Van Gogh held the IP rights to all paintings of people with only one ear. Posted by: phin Yeah, that sounds a lot like me, at least the “I” part. Of course, parties change over time, but to my way of thinking, the social conservative wing of the current Republican party are the true “Republicans in name only” RINO’s. I identified strongly with the Republican party circa 1976-1984. Back when George H.W. Bush said that he was proud to be a “card carrying member of the ACLU”. Those were my formative years, and when I first registered to vote, I went Republican. Back then, the social conservative/evangelical crowd was heavily Democrat. As many of those folks (like my parents) became disillusioned with the direction their party was heading, the Republican party basically recruited them, and in response shifted the parties platform. All IMO, of course. I understand and appreciate that this move helped bring the R’s to power, and keep them there for many years. But it also drove me out of the party around 1990, and I have been an avowed “I” ever since. I tend to vote more R than D, but sometimes grudgingly. I am convinced that the Republicans can’t win without the conservative vote. But I am also convinced that they can’t win with out the RINO (new definition) votes. Balancing the demands of each group is surely a significant challenge for the party leadership. I think they understand that, but sometimes I really have to wonder…. Posted by: jmaster "The last time I checked general shapes weren't intellectual property. Think of all the companies with logos that are derivatives of Yin and Yang. For a more specific argument, it would be like saying Van Gogh held the IP rights to all paintings of people with only one ear." Except this isn't a general shape. It's the sillouette of the logo used for Rhino3D. This is not claiming that since Rhino3D uses a Rhino head for its logo that you cannot use a Rhino head for yours (your Van Gogh example), this is saying that you cannot just go and take Rhino3D's logo and use it for yours. Additionaly, the Yin-Yang symbol is public domain, while Rhino3D's logo isn't. So none of your examples fit. Posted by: JSchuler I made the logo, with a stock photograph and entirely with open source software. I made it free for anyone to use. So bug off. Thanks, Bill. Posted by: j.d. EDIT to the above: I traced it using the GIMPs bezier tool using a rhino head as a guide. I have never seen or heard of Rhino 3D until I saw it here. Posted by: j.d. Sorry for the comment spam: I've done a post about this, where I recommended that everyone take down the logo, which I have done. You may want to do the same. I went and looked, and it does look quite similar. I don't want to get cross-ways with anyone. Apologies all around for the confusion and problems. Posted by: j.d. Doesn't matter if you traced it, and just because you used open source software doesn't mean you're free to rip people off. A stock photograph? So, what collection is it in, how much did it cost? Please, do tell. Or does "stock photograph" simply mean you found it via a Google image search? Need I remind you of Ward Churchill's career in art fraud? Please, get a modicum of originality. Posted by: JSchuler Thank you. Posted by: JSchuler JSchuler - Were you born an uneccessarily combative dick? Did it come later? Posted by: Bill from INDC It came from many years of hard work and practice. Posted by: JSchuler I emailed Bob McNeel a few minutes ago and asked him. If he objects to our logo, I'll email the RINOs to take it down. Posted by: Commissar Logo problem potentially solved. See here for details. Posted by: j.d. On the bright side, I found a good logo for your Democratic counterparts (warning: may also have intellectual property issues). Posted by: jeremy in NYC jmaster, I think we're identical twins separated at birth or something. LOL You just told the story of my political life. Early strong identifiction with GOP... disillusionment in late 80's... went Indie in 1990... trend of voting GOP about 2/3 of the time since then... remain devout Indie to this day... Heh... small world. Posted by: Kevin |
Feed Me, Seymour
bill *at* indcjournal *dot* com
Support Our Advertisers
Search
Archives
June 2008May 2008 April 2008 February 2008 January 2008 December 2007 November 2007 October 2007 September 2007 August 2007 July 2007 June 2007 May 2007 April 2007 March 2007 February 2007 January 2007 December 2006 November 2006 October 2006 September 2006 August 2006 July 2006 June 2006 May 2006 April 2006 March 2006 February 2006 January 2006 December 2005 November 2005 October 2005 September 2005 August 2005 July 2005 June 2005 May 2005 April 2005 March 2005 February 2005 January 2005 December 2004 November 2004 October 2004 September 2004 August 2004 July 2004 June 2004 May 2004 April 2004 March 2004 February 2004 January 2004
Extras
PDARSD Atom RSS 2.0 RSS 1.0
Credits
Our Blogroll
|