|
« Quick Review: Batman Begins |
Main
| Assaults on Liberty ( June 23, 2005
Quick Links
Posted by Bill *** Pining to teach your kiddies about deregulation, supply-side economics and polarizing political affiliations at an early age? It's like storytime with Anne Coulter! Yeesh.
Apparently, "half the population has some level of demonization and doesn't know it," proffers a wild-eyed, demon-hunting version of Dr. Phil.
As Boot notes, this is probably the biggest problem for the insurgency. It isn't fighting to destroy a tyranny, its fighting to establish one. It is fighting against the direct will of the people of Iraq as demonstrated by their vote. The ball, of course, is in the Iraqi government's court. Forming a broadly inclusive government which satisfies the vast majority of Iraqis will go a long way toward this insurgency's defeat. And indications are that's the way the process is going.
While I have nothing but contempt for Americans who show their displeasure with U.S. public policy by burning the American flag, amending the Constitution to prohibit this activity is absurd. It's a cheap political stunt but one that does nothing to make the country stronger or safer. If enacted, however, it would make it slightly less free. Bingo. Posted by Bill at June 23, 2005 12:22 PM | TrackBack (0) CommentsMethinks Mr. ASmallVictory forgot to take his sense of humor pills this morning. There's no way that book was intended for kids. And I'm entirely with you and James Joyner, except for one thing. What do you say we amend the Constitution to allow average citizens to give flag burners a good ass-whuppin? Posted by: mcg Hmm, well, to be fair, if I'm going to accuse ASmallVictory of not having a sense of humor, then I'd have to accuse the publisher as well. They seem to take the book seriously. Weird. Posted by: mcg Yeah, that's what was hard to believe - it's not satire intended for adults. Posted by: Bill from INDC No, I'm sure they're serious, but this certainly is over the top. Posted by: T Marcell Nah, I didn't post that. Posted by: Bill from INDC That Rainbow Party book is not intended to teach 14 year olds about sex. It's actually a cautionary tale - it ends up being a modern day Scarlett Letter in many ways. And that MISS SmallVictory, thankyouverymuch. (thanks for the link, bill) Posted by: Michele My hublest apologies, Miss :) Posted by: mcg "hublest" would, of course, be somewhat like "humblest", only its, um, hubler. |