|
« Quick Review: Batman Begins |
Main
| Assaults on Liberty ( June 23, 2005
Quick Links
Posted by Bill *** Pining to teach your kiddies about deregulation, supply-side economics and polarizing political affiliations at an early age? It's like storytime with Anne Coulter! Yeesh.
Apparently, "half the population has some level of demonization and doesn't know it," proffers a wild-eyed, demon-hunting version of Dr. Phil.
As Boot notes, this is probably the biggest problem for the insurgency. It isn't fighting to destroy a tyranny, its fighting to establish one. It is fighting against the direct will of the people of Iraq as demonstrated by their vote. The ball, of course, is in the Iraqi government's court. Forming a broadly inclusive government which satisfies the vast majority of Iraqis will go a long way toward this insurgency's defeat. And indications are that's the way the process is going.
While I have nothing but contempt for Americans who show their displeasure with U.S. public policy by burning the American flag, amending the Constitution to prohibit this activity is absurd. It's a cheap political stunt but one that does nothing to make the country stronger or safer. If enacted, however, it would make it slightly less free. Bingo. Posted by Bill at June 23, 2005 12:22 PM | TrackBack (0) CommentsMethinks Mr. ASmallVictory forgot to take his sense of humor pills this morning. There's no way that book was intended for kids. And I'm entirely with you and James Joyner, except for one thing. What do you say we amend the Constitution to allow average citizens to give flag burners a good ass-whuppin? Posted by: mcg Hmm, well, to be fair, if I'm going to accuse ASmallVictory of not having a sense of humor, then I'd have to accuse the publisher as well. They seem to take the book seriously. Weird. Posted by: mcg Yeah, that's what was hard to believe - it's not satire intended for adults. Posted by: Bill from INDC No, I'm sure they're serious, but this certainly is over the top. Posted by: T Marcell Nah, I didn't post that. Posted by: Bill from INDC That Rainbow Party book is not intended to teach 14 year olds about sex. It's actually a cautionary tale - it ends up being a modern day Scarlett Letter in many ways. And that MISS SmallVictory, thankyouverymuch. (thanks for the link, bill) Posted by: Michele My hublest apologies, Miss :) Posted by: mcg "hublest" would, of course, be somewhat like "humblest", only its, um, hubler. |
Feed Me, Seymour
bill *at* indcjournal *dot* com
Support Our Advertisers
Search
Archives
June 2008May 2008 April 2008 February 2008 January 2008 December 2007 November 2007 October 2007 September 2007 August 2007 July 2007 June 2007 May 2007 April 2007 March 2007 February 2007 January 2007 December 2006 November 2006 October 2006 September 2006 August 2006 July 2006 June 2006 May 2006 April 2006 March 2006 February 2006 January 2006 December 2005 November 2005 October 2005 September 2005 August 2005 July 2005 June 2005 May 2005 April 2005 March 2005 February 2005 January 2005 December 2004 November 2004 October 2004 September 2004 August 2004 July 2004 June 2004 May 2004 April 2004 March 2004 February 2004 January 2004
Extras
PDARSD Atom RSS 2.0 RSS 1.0
Credits
Our Blogroll
|