INDC Journal

« "Faux Americana" | Main | Gotcha »

May 04, 2005
Analyzing Humor - Reviews of the Week

Posted by Bill

horse4.jpg

The joke: Laura Bush's wisecrack about her naive husband accidentally milking a male horse:

"George didn't know much about ranches when we bought the place. ... But I'm proud of George. He's learned a lot about ranching since that first year when he tried to milk the horse. What's worse, it was a male horse."

The reviews:

The American Prospect:

It simply is amazing how complacently accepting the princely Bush first couple is of all the cheapness and rot in our culture. (And I won't begin to analyze the Bush milking the male horse joke and what it says about the Bushes' cynical use of the religious right.)

Someone clue me in here ... what exactly does the "milking the male horse joke" say about Bush's "cynical use of the religious right?" Is the religious right metaphorically represented by the horse? Or perhaps they're roosters in the barn, scandalized by the monstrous image of an ignorant bumbler fumbling with a boy-horse's junk? I'm not afraid to admit that I'm confused.

Let's check the rule book:

Leviticus 18:23

"Do not have sexual relations with an animal and defile yourself with it. A woman must not present herself to an animal to have sexual relations with it; that is a perversion."

Yup, bestiality is there, no bones about it. But does accidentally milking a male horse make one a de facto horsosexual? You know, if it was just an innocent, accidental equine reach-around in search of calcium-rich goodness? What if I just laugh at the joke while picturing the act - does that make me a horsosexual too? And not to unnecessarily compound the evening's transgressions against Leviticus, but I'm fairly certain that the C-SPAN cameras also caught Lynne Cheney nibbling on some cocktail shrimp. Chew on that.

Following the American Prospect's stinging condemnation, there's a doozy of a review at this blog, which I'm still attempting to decipher - earnest commentary or flat-out satire?

Wow. It is hard to put into words how horrendous and out of character this is for our first lady. Laura Bush is known as the book-wormy librarian. The model for Christian Conservative women across America... and here she is telling jokes with insinuations of beastiality and homosexual behavior. What a sad commentary on the state of the conservative movement in our society. The Republican party is moving rapidly toward the left while the Democrats are moving even further left than they already are. I believe we are being herded like cattle. Our ranch masters are leading us down the path they want us to go... which is straight towards international socialism.

Ah-HA! I was right about the religious right ranch metaphor! But the religious righties aren't the violated horse at all, they're jealous McCarthyite cattle!

Is it any wonder why the libs are fawning over this performance? Laura Bush has desended to their level... and they love it! But what does this say about our country...? How will our allies view this performance? Will it confirm their worst fears that our President is a bumbling fool? How about our enemies? Will Al-Qaeda be intimidated by the homosexual imagery of our President, masturbating a male horse? Or will they be emboldened? Will they come to the conclusion that we are just a bunch of idiots, or that we are decadent fools who need to die?

See, I was still unsure that the joke even inferred that Bush was in fact engaging in bestiality, yet now I'm confronted with the double-whammy of GAY bestiality. I mean, I'd just thought that it was a good-natured poke at a city dude that doesn't know his way around farm animals, but good conservatives saw the true, insidious nature of the joke's sexually-charged punchline - that George Bush was having gay horse sex, lovingly stroking the horse-hood of his softly neighing gay lover. In a gay way. Gay.

Which naturally begged the more important question - what will Al Qaeda think? And aren't we asking to die for such filth?

Moving on to our next review, she may be a prude, but she's our prude, and consistency is certainly one of Michelle Malkin's virtues:

Most of Mrs. Bush's humor at the correspondents' dinner was just right: Edgy but not over the edge. But I think the stripper and horse jokes were totally beneath her.

Just put it to the other-shoe test: If it were Teresa Heinz Kerry standing up on the dais telling the same jokes, the conservative commentariat would be buzzing for the rest of the year about what a tasteless skank she is.

If Teresa Heinz Kerry were standing on that dais, we'd have a lot bigger things to complain about than farm jokes, I'd imagine.

"Lighten up?" How about cleaning up? The First Lady resorting to cheap horse masturbation jokes is not much better than Whoopi Goldberg trafficking in dumb puns on the Bush family name. Unlike many Beltway and Manhattan commentators, I do not think the Wonkette-ization of the White House is a good thing.

And there we go with the "masturbation" again. Was it a sexual act? Is there any record of the horse enjoying it? For how long did Bush "milk" the animal? Did the horse in fact gloriously climax into the President's tin milk bucket, or did Bush just briefly grasp the appendage via the inept judgment that it was a milk teat? And what if had been a teat? Is that not akin to rounding second base with a farm animal?! I suppose it would dodge the homosexuality bullet, but what about the bestiality implications of heavy-petting your girl pets?!

And if we're looking at the "Wonkette-ization of the White House," I must know: for God's sake, what else did George Bush do to that horse?!

And what about the shrimp?!

The mind boggles.

UPDATE: And what about this wanker?

And will I ever stop asking questions?!

UPDATE: I'm currently getting spammed by a huge quantity of porn trackbacks advertising "horse-sex." Coincidence? Or God's angry wrath?

UPDATE: A burst of verse.

Posted by Bill at May 4, 2005 12:04 AM | TrackBack (12)

Comments

"Someone clue me in here ... what exactly does the 'milking the male horse joke' say about Bush's 'cynical use of the religious right?'"

A true, dedicated Christian would not have made that joke. The point the author is trying to make is that the Bushies aren't "true christians" but use the passion and zeal of religious followers for political gain. I don't agree with that assesment, but that is what the author is thinking.

"And not to compound the evening's transgressions against Leviticus, but I'm fairly certain that the C-SPAN cameras also caught Laura Bush nibbling on some cocktail shrimp. Chew on that."

The restriction on eating shrimp is part of the Old Covenant "Ceremonial Law" that was abolished when Jesus came.

Posted by: Hans Mast [TypeKey Profile Page] at May 4, 2005 11:11 AM

Holy honking sheep dip.

How many sticks can we collectively shove up our Republican butts? This is beyond stupid. Im embarrased . Don't these people have a freaking sense of humor? sense? Im giving Michelle a pass because she's smoking, but frankly everyone else needs to be smacked around.

Bill Bennet? yah, there's credibility there. Next time you're at Foxwoods, lay five down on Black thirteen for me.

Tomo Report? If its satire, you're trying waaaay to hard, bub.

There are others that are equally ready to jump off a building because Mrs. Bush intimated that she watched a network television program. I just have this advice for those that were shocked, shocked I say:

Shut the hell up. You're making us look like fools. Pat Robertson looks like a freaking Weatherman (terrorist,not anchor) compared to you nutjobs.

Again, exepting Michelle. ggrrowll...

Posted by: Doctor HS Manbot, Esquire [TypeKey Profile Page] at May 4, 2005 11:11 AM

The problem with that particular joke is that its two parts -- punchline and topper, are incorrectly sequenced for maximum effect. Still funny as presented, but would have been funnier, and perhaps avoided the controversy if it went something like,

"... seeing George running around with a pail when he couldn't even tell nannies from billies, bulls from cows -- and George, you CERTAINLY can't get milk from your stallion."

This flips it a bit from a sexual deviance joke to one of naivete. It sort of builds W up to a Lone Ranger macho cowboy stallion-riding image in the same moment it tears him down to a Stan Laurel clueless clown. And as such, enhancing the contrasts: it's funnier.


But the image was pretty funny even as told.

Posted by: pouncer [TypeKey Profile Page] at May 4, 2005 11:18 AM

The restriction on eating shrimp is part of the Old Covenant "Ceremonial Law" that was abolished when Jesus came.

There weren't any revisions on horse-tugging statutes, were there?

Posted by: Bill from INDC [TypeKey Profile Page] at May 4, 2005 11:25 AM

what about the horse's feelings? NO means NO! (or, this case, NEIGH means NAY!)
---
And could someone please provide me a citation to the Shrimp Prohibition Repeal Act of 30 A.D., please?

Posted by: milowent [TypeKey Profile Page] at May 4, 2005 11:30 AM

NEIGH means NAY!

HA!

Posted by: Bill from INDC [TypeKey Profile Page] at May 4, 2005 11:33 AM

"And will I ever stop asking questions?"

You talkin' to me? Huh? You talkin' to me?

Posted by: PJ [TypeKey Profile Page] at May 4, 2005 11:42 AM

I can authoritatively speak on this issue, and farm humor is kosher for Christians, even devout ones and even if it deals with their tallywhackers and poop and stuff. Just no profanity if you don't mind.

Posted by: spongeworthy [TypeKey Profile Page] at May 4, 2005 12:02 PM

"There weren't any revisions on horse-tugging statutes, were there?"

Nope. Most definitely not! *grin*

Posted by: Hans Mast [TypeKey Profile Page] at May 4, 2005 12:03 PM

milowent: Here's youre reference: Acts 10:10-16

I understand that the kosher diet was also quite practical in addition to ceremonial. It forbade eating vultures for obvious sanitary reasons. It also forbade eating pigs, which back then ate *other things* besides grain, which I understand would have made them a quite risky meal. Disclaimer: I am not sure about the accuracy of this paragraph. It's all been word of mouth and conjecture. I don't really have time to put any research into it... This disclaimer applies to this paragraph only.

Posted by: Hans Mast [TypeKey Profile Page] at May 4, 2005 12:12 PM

Link for above (Acts 10:10-16) scripture reference: http://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=Acts%2010:10-16;&version=9;

Posted by: Hans Mast [TypeKey Profile Page] at May 4, 2005 12:13 PM

spongeworthy: I wasn't agreeing with the author, just trying to explain what hey (not a typo; for an explanation: http://atthecrux.com/blogs/index.php?title=hum_or_hey ) was getting at.

Posted by: Hans Mast [TypeKey Profile Page] at May 4, 2005 12:24 PM

thanks for the reference, hans mast. i can see how it is interpreted that way.

Posted by: milowent [TypeKey Profile Page] at May 4, 2005 12:46 PM

milowent: Wouldn't you agree with that interpertation? Why not?

Posted by: Hans Mast [TypeKey Profile Page] at May 4, 2005 12:54 PM

Bill,
You ask whether blogging has jumped the shark then you come up with this. Horsosexual?
Quite obviously the shark is still some way off.
Probably May 9 th actually, jusdging by that piece from the Nation. HuffBlog arrives!

Re the jokes....there isn’t a single person who’s spent more than 15 minutes on a farm that hasn’t either been told or told those jokes, Christian, Muslim or Jew.
Damn, these people need to lighten up, thought the Republicans were supposed to be in contact with the real America...what’s that if it isn’t small towns, yeomen farmers and their sturdy independence (in the caricature, of course. I know it’s not really like that)?

Posted by: Tim Worstall [TypeKey Profile Page] at May 4, 2005 12:58 PM

As I believe the Bible would have said in this situation, "let he who is without sin milk the first horse."

Get over yourselves, people.

Posted by: Confederate Yankee [TypeKey Profile Page] at May 4, 2005 01:07 PM

If you have any doubts about the Biblical laws, er, covering human-animal relationships, you might want to check through this informative source
http://www.thebricktestament.com/the_law/beastiality/lv18_23a.html

Posted by: gail [TypeKey Profile Page] at May 4, 2005 01:13 PM

Posted by: gail [TypeKey Profile Page] at May 4, 2005 01:14 PM

milowent: If you need further assurance that the kosher diet is not meant to be kept in the new dispensation, check out 1 Timothy 4:1-4: "The Spirit clearly says that in later times some will abandon the faith and follow deceiving spirits...They...order them to abstain from certain foods, which God created to be received with thanksgiving by those who believe and who know the truth. For everything God created is good, and nothing is to be rejected if it is received with thanksgiving,"

I used some ellipsis, but took nothing out of context. See for yourself: Link for 1 Timothy 4:1-4: http://biblegateway.com/passage/?search=1%20timothy%204:1-4;&version=31;

Posted by: Hans Mast [TypeKey Profile Page] at May 4, 2005 01:38 PM

Above scripture is in New International Version (NIV).

Posted by: Hans Mast [TypeKey Profile Page] at May 4, 2005 01:38 PM

Yes these people most definitely need to get hit upside the head with a lighten-up bat. Do they even know that Laura said George was pulling the horse's pud? No, because she didn't say that. Maybe she was implying that he was trying to twist the horse's nipple. Her jokes were fairly clean, it's those folks' imagination that's dirty.
Besides, this was a semi-private affair, not meant for hoi polloi.

Posted by: rbj [TypeKey Profile Page] at May 4, 2005 02:33 PM

Yeah, delicate, fragile, easily affronted Michelle Malkin was the one who said the words "horse m....tion," not Laura Bush. And she said it in print, in black and white, while Laura made a clever reference to it.

And now she's going to be on O'Reilly tonight talking about it. And everyone's going to think that Conservatives are just as faint-hearted and uptight as she is.

It's ridiculous.

Posted by: ninme [TypeKey Profile Page] at May 4, 2005 05:17 PM

I'm with you on this one, Bill. The joke was old when Hee-Haw was new, and nobody back then thought it was about whacking off a horse.

Posted by: Pat Curley [TypeKey Profile Page] at May 4, 2005 06:46 PM

God you, guys are such pansy-ass city boys. Animals are messy. You want to know how messy? Read this: http://www.opinionatedbastard.com/archives/000372.html

Posted by: Opinionated Bastard [TypeKey Profile Page] at May 4, 2005 07:54 PM

I'm with you on this one, Bill. The joke was old when Hee-Haw was new, and nobody back then thought it was about whacking off a horse.

I'm not sure the extra entendre is a new addition to the culture. What's new is the lack of contact with family farming culture. Livestock reproduction is hardly "all natural".

Posted by: boris [TypeKey Profile Page] at May 5, 2005 09:03 AM

I know someone who works at the White House. Mrs. Bush's joke about the horse was an inside joke to Vladimir Putin just as a friendly hello. It had no sexual innuendos whatsoever.

Centuries back, Russian soldiers ate horse meat. In order to preserve it, they would take thin slices of horse meat and put it under the saddle of their horse. The salt from the horse preserved the meat, added flavor, and is now called, in English, "Horse Jerkie". I'm quite serious.

Putin was said to have rolled over in laughter as we watched via satellite from Russia.

Posted by: Puhndit [TypeKey Profile Page] at May 5, 2005 03:15 PM