INDC Journal

« Quick Links | Main | Man (UPDATED) »

April 15, 2005
Hegemonic Neocon Grooming is a Threat to the Peoples of the World!

Posted by Bill

Washington Post style writer Robin Givhan's latest fusion of deep political analysis and a bitchy makeover show:

John Bolton, President Bush's nominee for ambassador to the United Nations, desperately needs a haircut. It does not have to be a $600 Sally Hershberger cut. (Might I interject that no one on the planet needs a "$600 Sally Hershberger cut?" Unless one happens to be an insouciantly rich dickhead, that is. -- ED). Bolton simply needs the basics. Tidy the curling, unruly locks at the nape of his neck, tame the volume at the crown, reel in the wings flapping above his ears, and broker a compromise between his sand-colored mop and his snow-colored mustache.

He needs to do this, not because he should be minding the recommendations of men's fashion magazines or grooming experts but because when he settled in before the Senate Foreign Relations Committee this week to answer questions about his record, his philosophy and his intentions at the U.N., he looked as though he did not even have enough respect for the proceedings to bother combing his hair -- or, for that matter, straightening his tie, or wearing a shirt that did not put his neck in a chokehold. Bolton was one wrinkled suit away from being an insolent mess.
...
A Hollywood costumer could not have ordered a more perfectly stern Washington insider. Bolton embraces with a flourish all of the cliches that afflict so many men in Washington. During this testimony, his hand was constantly reaching up to adjust his no-frills glasses. His attire was not merely bland but careless. His hair was so poorly cut, it bordered on rude. Bolton might well argue that appearance has nothing to do with capabilities. But it certainly can be a measure of one's respect for the job.

Might I argue that Robin Givhan is an enjoyably shallow twit?

Posted by Bill at April 15, 2005 08:14 AM | TrackBack (2)

Comments

Yes. Yes, you might.

Posted by: marc [TypeKey Profile Page] at April 15, 2005 08:57 AM

How about a $250 Bill Clinton haircut, but then you have to block a whole airport.

Posted by: rbj [TypeKey Profile Page] at April 15, 2005 09:39 AM

Well, to be fair, isn't she The Post's fashion reporter? How can one report on something as fundamentally insubstantial as fashion and not be shallow?

Posted by: Boyd [TypeKey Profile Page] at April 15, 2005 11:56 AM

She could do an expose about the practical style of various inexpensive winter coats for the homeless living in northern climates.

Posted by: Bill from INDC [TypeKey Profile Page] at April 15, 2005 11:58 AM

Must be a thrill for WaPo to allow so much "valuable" print space for such a worthy statement of Bolton's hearings. I suppose that they have had enough op-eds already skewing his positions and belittling his abilities. So they might just as well stoop to picking on his clothes and hair cut.

Makes you wonder where she stands on the issue of how he'd perform as the UN ambassador. You know, something that would actually take brain cells to come to a conclusion on.

Posted by: Nylarthotep [TypeKey Profile Page] at April 15, 2005 12:42 PM

Bleedin heck! I just reviewed some of her bylines, and it looks like she really is the fashion reporter. Moreover, the story is on page C1, which is the front of the Style section -- which is, by definition, the fluffiest, least relevant section of the Post.

--|PW|--

Posted by: pennywit [TypeKey Profile Page] at April 15, 2005 01:00 PM

I didn't know that hair style was a dividing concept in the world or a problem for the UN, but it's good to see that John Bolton closely identifies with 99% of the peoples of the world that don't have designer hair styles.

If there every is a UNHAIR scandal, you can be sure that John Bolton will draw on the hair experts of the nation. Meanwhile, he will confine his "cuts" and "trims" to the budgetary type.

Posted by: Neo [TypeKey Profile Page] at April 15, 2005 01:09 PM

pennywit -

You are implying that I didn't KNOW that she was the fashion reporter? That still doesn't mean that she has license to be a nitwit free from my criticism.

And given the fact that barely ayone subscribes to the print edition of the Post any longer, I really don't care where it sits on the paper version - it was above the fold, A1-A - online.

Posted by: Bill from INDC [TypeKey Profile Page] at April 15, 2005 01:11 PM

Well, she does have a point. He does look a little overly scruffy. I'm sure SuperCuts would do. He could take in the moustache too, I think. It hangs down a bit low. He looks like he should be whittling something while chewing on hay or something.

Posted by: ninme [TypeKey Profile Page] at April 15, 2005 01:57 PM

My idea of a makeover for Bolton?

How he looks when his foot is in Kofi Annan's ass.

Posted by: Bill from INDC [TypeKey Profile Page] at April 15, 2005 02:20 PM

Honestly, Bill, I didn't know if you knew.

And next: placement still matters; a significant number of people do still read the print edition.

And I might also note that in the modern image age, how a nominee presents himself can provide insight on Washington culture (and coiffure) for the uninitiated.

--|PW|--

Posted by: pennywit [TypeKey Profile Page] at April 15, 2005 11:53 PM

pennywit -

Read the first line of my post again. :-)

Posted by: Bill from INDC [TypeKey Profile Page] at April 16, 2005 08:21 AM

Bill,

Your analysis is mostly correct. She is a "shallow twit."

Posted by: Old Dad [TypeKey Profile Page] at April 16, 2005 10:38 AM

Ah. I think I subconsciously capitalized it, as the Post Style writers seem an eclectic lot.

--|PW|--

Posted by: pennywit [TypeKey Profile Page] at April 16, 2005 01:56 PM

gents, you're laboring points under the thin assumption that said hair actually springs from Bolton's head... I think not. mind you, not as presentable as paul krugman's divot (the Kroogie Kut, as I like to call it), but a RUG none the less.

Curly Howard: "A Tarantula!!!"

Posted by: Glenn Bowen [TypeKey Profile Page] at April 17, 2005 10:11 AM

His hair was so poorly cut, it bordered on rude.

Hair can be rude? Suit wrinkles can be insolent?

Ummm... I know pet owners do it, but since when has fashion gone anthropomorphic?

Posted by: Darleen [TypeKey Profile Page] at April 18, 2005 09:51 AM

Oh good grief!

"Shallow twit" is awfully generous...

Posted by: Grouchy Old Yorkie Lady [TypeKey Profile Page] at April 18, 2005 11:23 PM