|
« Reminder (UPDATED) | Main | Joey Lawrence: "Whoa!" » March 25, 2005
Quick Links
Posted by Bill *** Politburo Diktat and World Wide Rant torch Paul from Wizbang's latest science/ideology strawman: Now that you've read the above, go read article in question and marvel at how it looks remarkably like nothing Paul said above. For the record, I don't know many evolution "true believers" that don't admit that it's merely a partially proven working theory open to revision. And I thought that I'd warned Paul about basing scientific analysis around an agenda...
But if the ever-more-shaky coalition that is currently the Republican majority is to hold, it will have to survive far worse dangers than Schiavo. The immigration issue is a perfect example of what I mean. I favor legal immigration, and lots of it. I don't favor - in fact, staunchly oppose - the illegal variety we now suffer, which is essentially a method of permitting Mexico to export the results of its horrible socialism to the US, where those losers in the socialist race are treated as serf-labor and exploited accordingly.
(Via who else but Flea)
I have: ABC first reported the memo as a bombshell that disclosed Republican strategy. Now it says that the memo "discussed a republican bill" and was "distributed to [some] repulbican [sic] senators." Whatever ABC may think of the "politics of the Shivo [sic] case," the network admits that it knows nothing about who authored and distributed the memo. I have. Posted by Bill at March 25, 2005 06:48 AM | TrackBack (0) Comments"Kinko's a better place to forge documents" Posted by: karasoth Has ABC News interviewed anybody on Dirty Harry Reid's staff yet? Posted by: David The best book I've seen on the science/ideology subject is The Science of God, by Gerald Schroeder. A man of science and faith, Schroeder clearly lays out the case that science and religion need not diverge in their explanation of the origin of the universe and life on earth. Well worth reading, whichever side of the debate you're on. (I'm going to copy this in the comments of a few other blogs -- no spam intended, I'm just a big fan of this very relevant book.) Posted by: insomni Knock yourself out, it's on topic. Posted by: Bill from INDC There have been many developments in this story. See Michelle Malkin's and Powerlilne websites. Posted by: HS Why is it that the evolution/creation debate draws so much input from people who know nothing about the subject? I pointed out on Paul's post that he wouldn't go spouting witless maunderings about M-theory, because he wasn't a theoretical physicist. But the fact he's not an evolutionary biologist hasn't stopped him from similar bloviation about a subject on which he knows nothing (stipulating that he is going to redefine abiogenesis as evolution was my first hint that he is a Grade I Clueless Twit). I have neither the mathematics nor the biology to make meaningful contributions to string theory or the neo-Darwinian Synthesis, but I know enough about both to spot when a layman is talking nonsense. Posted by: David Gillies |
Feed Me, Seymour
bill *at* indcjournal *dot* com
Support Our Advertisers
Search
Archives
June 2008May 2008 April 2008 February 2008 January 2008 December 2007 November 2007 October 2007 September 2007 August 2007 July 2007 June 2007 May 2007 April 2007 March 2007 February 2007 January 2007 December 2006 November 2006 October 2006 September 2006 August 2006 July 2006 June 2006 May 2006 April 2006 March 2006 February 2006 January 2006 December 2005 November 2005 October 2005 September 2005 August 2005 July 2005 June 2005 May 2005 April 2005 March 2005 February 2005 January 2005 December 2004 November 2004 October 2004 September 2004 August 2004 July 2004 June 2004 May 2004 April 2004 March 2004 February 2004 January 2004
Extras
PDARSD Atom RSS 2.0 RSS 1.0
Credits
Our Blogroll
|