|
« I'd Say | Main | Awesome Quote » January 30, 2005
Yes!
Posted by Bill
WaPo: Iraq's first democratic election in nearly half a century neared its conclusion Sunday with many observers saying the day appeared to have yielded higher turnout than expected and less violence than feared. (Emphasis mine) If these projections hold up, we're looking at a smashing success. Without a doubt, the level of violence was much lower than anyone expected. A notable quote: In Najaf, the Shiite holy city that embodies Shiite Muslim hopes for the elections, a light early turnout meant several dozen people at one station in the first hour. Among the first out was Najaha Hassan Rahadi, 58, who broke into tears when asked why she was voting. Scanning a minority of the headlines of a google news search gives us a tedious glimpse of the political unconsciousness of Fifth Columnists: Bloody dawn to Iraq democracy Iraq vote bloodied by attacks Iraq poll marred by violence What's the real story here? That two dozen people died in a country that's a regular victim of terrorism? Or that perhaps 9,100,000 people stood up and demanded Democracy, shedding a half-century of brutal oppression and defying the threats of terrorists? What it would take to wring a positive headline out of those editors is beyond me. Robert Fisk characteristically places clinging to the tatters of his ideological self-worth above the ideals of humanism and freedom: 'What a bloody charade' No Fisk, your declared belief in "progressive values" is the bloody charade. Overall though, at this point, I'm scoring the MSM a C+; the turnout's message is undeniable, and the ideological snipers grumble on the fringes. This Reuters headline hits it: Iraqis Brave Bombs to Vote in Their Millions UPDATE: Michelle Malkin covers the remarkable angle of women voting in a Muslim country: Will American feminists be celebrating these amazing images and this historic day? The silence is deafening. Here's one of the first shameful answers. Outside the Beltway nails it: But there is an interesting subtext: over and over what Iraqis are saying is that they were “voting against terrorism” or that they “voted for peace.” Which means that this election went from a referendum on the American “occupation” to a rejection of the terrorism of Abu al-Zarqawi.
That might as well be a middle finger to Zarqawi. Instapundit has a few typically comprehensive round-ups. Dean gets brutal and frank: 72% turnout, you reactionary, anti-progressive, anti-humanist pissants. Iraq the Model remarks on voting: The people have won. We would love to share what we did this morning with the whole world, we can't describe the feelings we've been through but we'll try to share as much as we can with you.
Curioser and Curioser rounds up more Iraqi blogger reactions. Day by Day already ran with the "finger" meme:
UPDATE: The number of people estimated to have voted was edited for accuracy (8 to 9.1 million). Posted by Bill at January 30, 2005 09:27 AM | TrackBack (18) CommentsOMG!!! Is anyone else watching this CRAP on NBC? I thought I'd check out MTP this morning and saw a fatalistic report by Brian Williams...and then John Kerry spouting off his typical pessimistic rhetoric! Can't we have an alternative viewpoint? Or do we have to suffer an entire HOUR with this idiot?!?! Oh wait, I forgot--I'm not watching the channel that's Fair and Balanced Posted by: LuvyaDubya The turn-out in some places is as high as 90 pct according to Fox. And around the blogosphere are pictures of Iraqis proudly showing their ink-stained fingers. G-d bless the brave Iraqis. Posted by: Retread One leader, and only one leader, has had the vision and courage to see this through. GEORGE W. BUSH. Click on the link. Never forget. Posted by: RogerB While it is sad that a little over 30 people have died during the voting, I think it is to deny the enormity of just what happened by focusing on that, shoot those casualty counts are "low" if you think about what the terrorists were promising. Malkin's points were excellent about US feminists and their reaction to today's vote. The left will spin this to make it look like a failure, and in the proccess they are going to look like sore losers. Posted by: Just Me TalkLeft is proud of her side's (non-)response: "The top liberal bloggers, Daily Kos, Atrios, Josh Marshall, knowing better, are either ignoring the elections or have moved on." Posted by: MDP Punditry from the Left: Driving Reasonable Voters Out of the Democrat Party for 3 Decades.
Will American feminists be celebrating these amazing images and this historic day? The silence is deafening. "The right-wing blogosphere, like President Bush, considers the elections a triumph for democracy. The top liberal bloggers, Daily Kos, Atrios, Josh Marshall, knowing better, are either ignoring the elections or have moved on. Thanks Jeralyn, politics first, principles of human justice .... whatever. Posted by: capitano Every human being deserves freedom and democracy. God bless the Iraqi elections. Posted by: TallDave |
Feed Me, Seymour
bill *at* indcjournal *dot* com
Support Our Advertisers
Search
Archives
May 2008April 2008 February 2008 January 2008 December 2007 November 2007 October 2007 September 2007 August 2007 July 2007 June 2007 May 2007 April 2007 March 2007 February 2007 January 2007 December 2006 November 2006 October 2006 September 2006 August 2006 July 2006 June 2006 May 2006 April 2006 March 2006 February 2006 January 2006 December 2005 November 2005 October 2005 September 2005 August 2005 July 2005 June 2005 May 2005 April 2005 March 2005 February 2005 January 2005 December 2004 November 2004 October 2004 September 2004 August 2004 July 2004 June 2004 May 2004 April 2004 March 2004 February 2004 January 2004
Extras
PDARSD Atom RSS 2.0 RSS 1.0
Credits
Our Blogroll
|