|
« The Bush Administration Must Go | Main | What a Great Quote » December 19, 2004
Congrats!
Posted by Bill ... to Powerline for their appropriate recognition in Time Magazine. They easily deserve such great credit for Rathergate, as it's doubtful that any of us would have quickly taken the steps to carefully scrutinize the suspicious documents without their prescient vetting and convincing presentation of what initially seemed like a run-of-the-mill conspiracy theory from the fever swamps of the internet. The daily excellence of their blog is also a key factor, of course. Fantastic job, guys. It's also important to note that Free Republic members initiated the Rather scrutiny, LGF's early overlay of a Word document turned the abstract concept of fake documentation into a powerful visual statement that animated the story, and Ratherbiased was hot on my heels with obtention of expert analysis specifically intended to resonate with mainstream media outlets and give the story early legs in the press. These kudos don't even touch the dozens of bloggers that stepped up with important investigative work, the important summary work done by Allahpundit and Instapundit, or the vital, steadfast leadership of Hugh Hewitt and Jim Geraghty during the highs and lows of the investigation. Open-source journalism is a team sport, and all of these bloggers showed great cooperation and initiative. What a year, eh? Posted by Bill at December 19, 2004 12:46 PM | TrackBack (1) CommentsAnd don't forget *your* huge contribution. I visited here several times a day and was so impressed with your thoroughness and calmness through it all. Bravo to you, Bill Posted by: Maggie Powerline certainly deserves the award, but TIME shouldn't be so rude to Glenn Reynolds. http://www.dinocrat.com/archives/2004/12/19/using-rathergate-as-a-cover-up-of-swiftboatvets/ Thanks, Jack Risko Posted by: jack risko This is what democracy looks like! Posted by: Ghost of a flea Geraghty...how do you pronounce that anyway? Re Rathergate: the LGF overlay was cute and easy to comprehend, but you did the leg work of the interview that gave the story credibility and completely refuted CBS's "expert" with a recognized national expert. Posted by: Jane What the heck is this, a conspiracy? Maybe I'm a little biased, but really, I thought you were leading the investigation the whole time. I just don't get it. Posted by: Jane I just don't get it. Me neither. Apparently, the Corner(!) was. Posted by: Bill from INDC |
Feed Me, Seymour
bill *at* indcjournal *dot* com
Support Our Advertisers
Search
Archives
June 2008May 2008 April 2008 February 2008 January 2008 December 2007 November 2007 October 2007 September 2007 August 2007 July 2007 June 2007 May 2007 April 2007 March 2007 February 2007 January 2007 December 2006 November 2006 October 2006 September 2006 August 2006 July 2006 June 2006 May 2006 April 2006 March 2006 February 2006 January 2006 December 2005 November 2005 October 2005 September 2005 August 2005 July 2005 June 2005 May 2005 April 2005 March 2005 February 2005 January 2005 December 2004 November 2004 October 2004 September 2004 August 2004 July 2004 June 2004 May 2004 April 2004 March 2004 February 2004 January 2004
Extras
PDARSD Atom RSS 2.0 RSS 1.0
Credits
Our Blogroll
|