|
« Pause Your Cynicism |
Main
| Explosives: A Shocking New Russian Wrinkle October 27, 2004
Upsetting Conventional Wisdom, Part Two
Posted by Bill CW says: "Iraq has no ties to Al Qaeda; it's all in Dick Cheney's head!"
(Via Beautiful Atrocities) Posted by Bill at October 27, 2004 03:45 PM | TrackBack (8) CommentsSo even a court of law has ruled that there was a link between Al Qaeda and Saddam Hussein... I thought all liberals and the MSM thought that every word from a judge, especially a Clinton appointed one, was like the word of God. Oh yeah...not if those words help a Republican. No matter what the result in the election this year, the MSM must be replaced...the MSM must be crushed... Posted by: Another Thought at October 27, 2004 03:57 PM The Bush campaign should have touted this earlier...it's a great retort to the Kerry crowd of appeasers... Posted by: Another Thought at October 27, 2004 04:01 PM the MSM must be crushed Kind of hyperbolic, isn't it? Modified, altered, ignored, changed, subverted, worked-around, whatever ... but "crushed?" Posted by: Bill from INDC at October 27, 2004 04:07 PM Sobering. Posted by: Textbook Stupidity at October 27, 2004 04:19 PM Unfortuntely the relevant footnote: 22. CBSNews.com, “Court Rules: Al Qaida, Iraq Linked,” does not reveal the citation for the case. I would like to read the exact wording of the judgment.
Posted by: hm at October 27, 2004 04:22 PM For hm Smith I, 262 F. Supp. 2d at 232 ... Posted by: ggarmon at October 27, 2004 05:12 PM ggarmon, thank you! Posted by: hm at October 27, 2004 05:38 PM For the MSM: I vote for "crushed." If I woke up tomorrow and ABC, CBS, and NBC were permenantly off the air, it wouldn't bother me in the slightest. They are EVIL. Posted by: Sydney Carton at October 27, 2004 06:00 PM Sydney, You can add the NY Ties, The LA Times, Chicago Tribune, Boston Globe and others to that list as well. They are all insignificant in my book. Posted by: Sonar5 at October 27, 2004 06:58 PM When do RICO laws not apply to the MSM? Don't they use current events and controversy to create revenue; to create a product to sell or operate in the marketplace? Is there not an inherent perverse incentive to disinform and agitate? Are they really so indemnified from selling defective products and services? Free speech is one thing; commercial speech is another. Political reporting and political advertising are linked. The incested MSM commercial economy for candidate advertising is approaching something akin to extortion if correction of slothful, defective reporting only occurs if you purchase advertising to correct it. Charging campaigns and candidates huge sums to correct the false, negligent or wrongfully withheld material facts provided as a product by commercial services MSM calls "the news" raises basic questions that should be pursued. When one looks at the orchestrations between MSM members, such as the NYT and CBS over the 380 missing tons, don't RICO statutes come into play at some point. IMHO, the MSM uses willful disinformation and exploits internal error to drive up revenues and brand value. It's an ugly thought, but it's an ugly practice they've turned into million dollar salaries for themselves. What about those fine lines between commerce, opinion, product and fraud? The question of guilty knowledge behind the MSM misreporting has become palpable. If that they should do it predatorily to jack up revenues may well be another thing indeed. Posted by: willem at October 27, 2004 09:21 PM Interesting take. Maybe NY's spitzer will look into it, but I doubt it. Posted by: Sonar5 at October 27, 2004 09:33 PM Yeah. No one's in a hurry to fix it.. yet. But some say Michael Moore was compelled to quietly abandon Documentary status and enter the AA under the Fiction catagory to avoid a salivating pack of class action litigators with the Cali Consumer Protection Act in hand. Check out: "It's Over. The Fat Man Sang" http://scyllacharybdis.blogspot.com/2004_09_01_scyllacharybdis_archive.html Posted by: willem at October 27, 2004 09:53 PM Posted by: puppetz at October 30, 2004 02:10 AM |
Feed Me, Seymour
bill *at* indcjournal *dot* com
Support Our Advertisers
Search
Archives
June 2008May 2008 April 2008 February 2008 January 2008 December 2007 November 2007 October 2007 September 2007 August 2007 July 2007 June 2007 May 2007 April 2007 March 2007 February 2007 January 2007 December 2006 November 2006 October 2006 September 2006 August 2006 July 2006 June 2006 May 2006 April 2006 March 2006 February 2006 January 2006 December 2005 November 2005 October 2005 September 2005 August 2005 July 2005 June 2005 May 2005 April 2005 March 2005 February 2005 January 2005 December 2004 November 2004 October 2004 September 2004 August 2004 July 2004 June 2004 May 2004 April 2004 March 2004 February 2004 January 2004
Extras
PDARSD Atom RSS 2.0 RSS 1.0
Credits
Our Blogroll
|