|
« Missing Explosives Update |
Main
| The Real Lesson from the NY Times October 27, 2004
Upsetting Conventional Wisdom (UPDATED)
Posted by Bill CW says: "Undecideds always break for the challenger." Not according to this Rasmussen Reports survey: Those who made up their mind earlier in the process tend to be more supportive of Senator Kerry. Those who made up their mind later in the process are more supportive of the President. This is consistent with the fact that Senator Kerry led in most polls through mid-August and has generally trailed since Labor Day and the Republican National Convention. Among voters who made up their minds in the Spring of 2004 or sooner, Kerry is favored by a 51% to 48% margin. Keep talking Senator, keep talking. Let's see how many times you can say "Mary Cheney's a lesbian" before election day. (Thanks to Michael Kim) UPDATE: Ace has more on the phenomenon. Posted by Bill at October 27, 2004 11:59 AM | TrackBack (2) Commentscriminy. thank you for doing my homework. I am sick of this one being touted as part of a foregone conclusion for Kerry. it's also part of why I ignore polling; it's like high school. mostly its function is to keep a lot of folks busy. Posted by: tee bee at October 27, 2004 12:28 PM Here’s more support for the view that the remaining undecideds are not going to wreck Bush. Posted by: Lastango at October 27, 2004 12:57 PM Further, the CW was based on a number surveys taken when there were Republican Presidents which meant that the challenger was a Dem. So? Well, the CW does not take into account the fact that partisanship remains the biggest predictor of vote choice. So? This matters because there are now more registered Republicans than registered Democrats (not the case for the past 72 years or so) so that when push comes to shove more people should break Bush than Kerry. Or so goes my wishful thinking. Posted by: Rusty Shackleford at October 27, 2004 01:30 PM Not surprising. The more visible Kerry is, the less people like him. Didn't we all realize this some time ago? Wasn't there a month a while back where he all but disappeared? And during the time his numbers went up, up, up? Stay on the news Kerry! We want to see your ugly mug every night! Posted by: amy at October 27, 2004 01:33 PM Pat Caddell, Carter's pollster, said essentially the same on Hannity and Colmes last night. In Presidential elections, sometimes undecidededs break for the incumbent as a risk-management stratagem. Steve Bragg Posted by: Steve Bragg at October 27, 2004 02:40 PM My personal theory: true undecideds don't vote; they are "undecided" because they are apathetic, uninformed, or alienated. Other so-called "undecideds," assuming they are serious participants in the process, decided weeks ago. Posted by: MD at October 27, 2004 07:49 PM Posted by: puppettz at October 30, 2004 02:06 AM |
Feed Me, Seymour
bill *at* indcjournal *dot* com
Support Our Advertisers
Search
Archives
June 2008May 2008 April 2008 February 2008 January 2008 December 2007 November 2007 October 2007 September 2007 August 2007 July 2007 June 2007 May 2007 April 2007 March 2007 February 2007 January 2007 December 2006 November 2006 October 2006 September 2006 August 2006 July 2006 June 2006 May 2006 April 2006 March 2006 February 2006 January 2006 December 2005 November 2005 October 2005 September 2005 August 2005 July 2005 June 2005 May 2005 April 2005 March 2005 February 2005 January 2005 December 2004 November 2004 October 2004 September 2004 August 2004 July 2004 June 2004 May 2004 April 2004 March 2004 February 2004 January 2004
Extras
PDARSD Atom RSS 2.0 RSS 1.0
Credits
Our Blogroll
|