|
« More from ABC's Mark Halperin | Main | "Key Findings" of the Duelfer Report » October 11, 2004
Note to John Kerry and the MSM (UPDATED with Letter from Col. Day)
Posted by Bill
The Washington Times' fawning treatment aside - I'd be worried: These Swiftees, at times jocular (breaking into "Row, row, row your boat") and at other times on the verge of tears, are angry and frustrated. Not only because they say Mr. Kerry has lied about his service and refuses to sign the form that releases his military records to the public, but because 30 years ago, the candidate threw away his medals and called his fellow servicemen murderers, rapists, baby killers and cowards. John Kerry's assertions in front of the Senate were a manipulative repetition of largely discredited testimony of atrocities that was provided at the Winter Soldier's Conference in 1971. While the Swift Vets deceptively imply that John Kerry made these accusations from personal recollections of atrocities, they certainly have a right to be angry at his use of false testimony to game the political environment, especially when POW's held in North Vietnam at the time were being tortured to provide similar false testimony for the purpose of propaganda. I'd almost welcome the MSM's attempts to dismiss a man like Bud Day after this last push by the SBVT. Whatever the overall judgment of their wide-ranging and partially challenged accusations, It's bizarre, inaccurate dissonance to paint a group of highly-decorated veterans that have wept on camera as calculating Republican shills, just because their initial press conferences were ignored by the media and they were subsequently forced to obtain funding from overtly partisan interests. They have a right to air their grievances. UPDATE: Redstate has more: What the Times gets wrong, however, is the tone of the Swifties. To be sure, the Swift Vets are angry - and they have a right to be, not only because of John Kerry's action during and since the Vietnam war, but also because of the media's complete and utter smear job against them personally. What the Times missed, however, is the genuine reluctance of these men. They would all rather be doing something else, spending time with their families or enjoying their retirement. UPDATE: Malkin adds a similar sentiment. UPDATE: Redstate also has the text of Col. Day's Medal of Honor citation. UPDATE: Below the fold is a letter from Col. Day to Joe Scarborough regarding John Kerry: Dear Joe: The major issue in the Swiftboat stories is, and always has been, what John Kerry did in 1971 after he returned from Vietnam. Kerry cast a long dark shadow over all Vietnam Veterans with his outright perjury before the Senate concerning atrocities in Vietnam. His stories to the Senate committee were absolute lies..fabrications..perjury..fantasies, with NO substance. That dark shadow has defamed the entire Vietnam War veteran population, and gave "Aid and Comfort" to our enemies..the Vietnamese Communists. Kerry's stories were outright fabrications, and were intended for political gain with the radical left - McGovern, Teddy and Bobby Kennedy followers, Jane Fonda, Tom Hayden, and the radical left who fantasized that George McGovern was going to be elected in 1972. Little wonder that returning soldiers from Vietnam were spit upon and castigated as "baby killers." A returned war hero said so. Kerry cut a dashing figure as a war hero, lots of medals, and returned home because of multiple war wounds, even a silver star. His Senate testimony confirmed what every hippie had been chanting on the streets - "Hey hey LBJ..How many kids did you kill today?" He obviously was running for political office in 1971. Until Lt. John O' Neil, himself a Swifboat commander, spoke out before the 1972 elections against Kerry's outright deceptions, there was no one from the Swiftboat scene that could contradict Kerry's self serving lies. I was a POW of the Vietnamese in Hanoi in 1971, and I am aware that the testimony of John Kerry, the actions of Jane Fonda and Tom Hayden, and the radical left; all caused the commies to conclude that if they hung on, they would win. North Vietnamese General Bui Tin commented that every day the Communist leadership listened to world news over the radio to follow the growth of the anti-war movement. Visits to Hanoi by Jane Fonda and Ramsey Clark gave them confidence to hold in the face of battlefield reverses. The guts of it was that propaganda from the anti-war group was part of their combat strategy. While the Commies were hanging on, innumerable U.S. Soldiers, Sailors, Marines and Air Force members were being killed in combat. Every battle wound to Americans after Kerry's misdirected testimony is related to Kerry's untruthfulness. John Kerry contributed to every one of these deaths with his lies about U.S. atrocities in Vietnam. He likewise defamed the U.S. with our allies and supporters. His conduct also extended the imprisonment of the Vietnam Prisoners of War, of which I was one. I am certain of at least one POW death after his testimony, which might have been prevented with an earlier release of the POWs. My friend and room mate Senator John S. McCain denounced the Swiftboat video by John O'Neil. I have a different take on the Swiftboat tape and disagree with my good friend John. John Kerry opened up his character as a war hero reporting for duty to the country with a hand salute...and his band of brothers..of which he was the chief hero. Most of his convention speech was about John Kerry, Vietnam hero, and his band of brothers. John Kerry's character is not only fair game, it is the primary issue. He wants to use Bill Clinton's "is", as an answer to his lack of character. The issue is trust. Can anyone trust John Kerry?? "Never lie, cheat or steal" is the West Point motto. When a witness perjures himself at trial, the judge notes that his testimony lacks credibility. Should we elect a known proven liar to lead us in wartime?? I draw a direct comparison of General Benedict Arnold of the Revolutionary War, to Lieutenant John Kerry. Both went off to war, fought, and then turned against their country. General Arnold crossed over to the British for money and position. John Kerry crossed over to the Vietnamese with his assistance to the anti-war movement, and his direct liaison with the Vietnamese diplomats in Paris. His reward: political gain. Senator, United States. His record as a Senator for twenty years has been pitiful. Conjure up, if you will, one major bill that he has sponsored. John Kerry for President? Ridiculous. Unthinkable. Unbelievable. Outrageous. Col. Geo. "Bud" Day, Medal of Honor, Vietnam POW 1967- 1973, USMC- USA- Posted by Bill at October 11, 2004 11:59 AM | TrackBack (7) CommentsMy thanks to these men, their sacrifice, and what they've fought to protect. The insults from John Kerry go far beyond the men directly connected to the events of the Vietnam War; they have resonance with the ancestry of everyone who defended liberty. Can anyone imagine Kerry making statements
Posted by: Dan Patterson at October 11, 2004 01:04 PM Kerry is running on automatic in refusing AND avoiding the swiftvet situation. I would dance with glee if somehow his 'secret' military records were to be leaked. At this point I am quite willing to use any method to get the end result needed to expose this man for the atrocity he is. Kerry is not running on all cylinders. Posted by: mshyde at October 11, 2004 01:19 PM At this point I am quite willing to use any method to get the end result That is dangerous thinking, my friend, the same type of thinking that uses DUI accusations against Bush just prior to the last election, and the same type of thinking taht puts fake National Guard documents on 60 Minutes. I condemn that sentiment. There's plenty of logical, correct material around to make a point. Posted by: Bill from INDC at October 11, 2004 01:23 PM You're right, that was irresponsible on my part to state such sentiments. I am very frustrated with the sense of seeing Kerry not reaping what he's sowed. If you wish to delete that post I agree with you. Posted by: mshyde at October 11, 2004 01:41 PM The medals Kerry threw away were not his. He was all for show even then. Posted by: darcey at October 11, 2004 01:57 PM MSYDE: Posted by: Pete at October 11, 2004 02:20 PM OOPS, I meant "Animal Farm", not "1984". I should not watch TV and type at the same time. Posted by: Pete at October 11, 2004 02:22 PM I agree with you, Bill. that there's plenty of logical material to make a point or two. The problem is that these points are not being a given a fair shot at being heard by the public who are then left to make up their own mind. Posted by: Lola Lee at October 11, 2004 02:45 PM Folks, have faith. Surely the Bush-Cheney campaign team has a few facts up their sleeve for the last three weeks of this campaign. Let them bring out the material when it is most timely, and let us quietly, calmly speak with our friends and families telling them what we know now. Posted by: American Soldier's Mom at October 11, 2004 04:06 PM I must say that I am not a fan WWF-style politics: the type that finds personal problems of candidates and exploits them. The Swift Boat ads are, therefore, somewhat troublesome to me in the larger scheme of things. But I learned as a child that you'll reap what you sow. And John Kerry has brought this upon himself. Kerry stirred up the hornets' nest when he came back from Vietnam. And not Bush or any bystander can stop the swarm once the hornets have identified their enemy. Unfortunately, despite substantive debates, this campaign will be remembered less for substance and more for Swift boat claims just like 1998 is remembered for Willie Horton. Posted by: Jim Pfaff at October 11, 2004 04:46 PM Kerry should sign his form 180. Barring that, we can only assume. Bush describes an epiphany that changed him from an irresponsible young man into a more serious adult. When was Kerry's epiphany? What can we point to as a turning-point in Kerry's life where he changed from the man who bolted from Vietnam after getting three boo-boos and left other men to fight in his place? When did he change from the man who flew to Paris to meet with both the North Vietnamese AND the Viet Cong, but not those representing his own country (and doing this while he was IN the U.S. military, Naval Reserve)? When did he change? Why did he change? Has he ever discussed the change in his thinking? [These are rhetorical questions. We all know the answers.] Posted by: OCBill at October 11, 2004 05:02 PM What Kerry did during his antiwar protest days was shameful. And this bunk of what Kerry said only being him repeating what he heard at the Winter Soldier investigation, as if he were just some investigative reporter... First, he was part of the Winter Soldier group...he even authored that horrible book "The New Soldier" giving more credit to their lies... Second, in his testimony, he clearly is representing this group, as their advocate: "I would like to talk, representing all those veterans, and say that several months ago in Detroit, we had an investigation at which over 150 honorably discharged and many very highly decorated veterans testified to war crimes committed in Southeast Asia, not isolated incidents but crimes committed on a day-to-day basis with the full awareness of officers at all levels of command. " Kerry clearly was the advocate of liars, and that makes him a liar too... What Kerry really did was elevate the charges of the antiwar group to newfound credibility and publicity...and of course, the MSM was all too willing and happy to jump onboard and run with these accusations... Posted by: Another Thought at October 11, 2004 05:17 PM It's one thing to weigh what someone did in their youth as immature or misguided - but for Kerry to never have apologized to people like Sen McCain and Col. Day smacks of complete arrogance. Colonel Day's letter is a complete spanking, pure and simple. And there is no rational way to defend the opposing viewpoint, in my book. If anyone wants to be President, shouldn't the country reasonably expect that anything to do with their 'public' life should be available to scrutiny? Why hasn't Kerry signed Form 180? Posted by: OneDrummer at October 11, 2004 05:49 PM "While the Swift Vets deceptively imply that John Kerry made these accusations from personal recollections of atrocities" Explain that Bill. Posted by: Roundguy at October 11, 2004 06:41 PM John Kerry is a degenerate. That's all I can say. What I really wanted to say about him would probably be deleted by Bill in about ten seconds. Posted by: Textbook Stupidity at October 11, 2004 07:55 PM Roundguy: Kerry was "quoting" people at the Winter Soldier investigation which was the VVAW "finding" "Vietnam vets" who engaged in or witnessed "war atrocities". Anyway, scare quotes excluded, he never claimed to have seen the more graphic examples that he quotes in his Senate 1971 testimony. He said he was getting that info from other vets. The war crimes he claims to have witnessed were the more mild accusations like "search and destroy missions", etc. Basically any tactic that is typical of military combat and involved killing NVA or Viet Cong, he labeled a war crime. Never mind how loony that claim was and never mind that belief carried over into his opposition to Reagan's Nicaragua policies (seared, seared into his memory). Never mind that Kerry and the VVAW basically plucked up anybody they could that could appear to have been in combat in Vietnam when many weren't and never mind that Kerry supplied many of the people in it with the same fabricated stories that he would later quote of them. It's a distinction of a sorts. Posted by: Elric at October 11, 2004 09:22 PM darcey, "The medals Kerry threw away were not his. He was all for show even then. I thought that what Kerry threw away were some of his own decorations (ribbons, technically counted under the term 'medals') as well as some others that somebody else asked him to throw away. Posted by: clancy at October 12, 2004 12:34 AM Lola Lee, "I agree with you, Bill. that there's plenty of logical material to make a point or two. The problem is that these points are not being a given a fair shot at being heard by the public who are then left to make up their own mind." Such as...? Bush is free to make all the points he wished during his campaign speeches and ads, as well as during nationally televised debates. Where do you see the problem? Posted by: clancy at October 12, 2004 12:38 AM Why hasn't Bush signed Form 180? Posted by: clancy at October 12, 2004 12:39 AM Clancy - Why hasn't Bush signed Form 180? He has. The D's blame the Pentagon for failing to release everything. In contrast, Kerry has not signed off to release his records. Posted by: Bill from INDC at October 12, 2004 01:04 AM Bill, Are you sure? I didn't think he had. Must have been very recent. I may be wrong, but perhaps you have a link. Posted by: clancy at October 12, 2004 04:45 AM I'm sorry, but where have you "vets" been for the last 25 years? Why is it that all of a sudden you've crawled out from under your rocks to slam Kerry? Do you realize how few in number you are compared to those of us who marched WITH Kerry, and how few in number you are to those who believe, right now, that the Viet Nam war was wrong, that Bush is killing our soldiers RIGHT NOW with his inability to lead (as it was with Nixon) and how duped we were with Bush's false, disproved reasons for going to war with Iraq? Have you looked at President Bush's record in office and his record in the Guard (nice draft dodging, Bush!) I hope Bush and the Republicans are paying you well. You will go down in history as men who festered for 25 years and then showed up to support an ignorant President who lied to the people. Think back. If you really served in Nam, remember what it was like, and then consider our boys in Iraq, fighting a war that was poorly planned; sent there believing they were going to protect us from weapons of mass destruction and in retaliation for the 9/11 attacks. Neither was true. Where is your compassion for these young men? Have you become so bitter and calloused that you still can't see the light? Posted by: Nam Vet at October 16, 2004 09:12 PM 4465 http://www.totallyfreecreditreport.org Posted by: free credit report at October 24, 2004 01:29 PM 1792 http://www.slots-big.com slots Posted by: slots at October 25, 2004 07:32 AM |
Feed Me, Seymour
bill *at* indcjournal *dot* com
Support Our Advertisers
Search
Archives
June 2008May 2008 April 2008 February 2008 January 2008 December 2007 November 2007 October 2007 September 2007 August 2007 July 2007 June 2007 May 2007 April 2007 March 2007 February 2007 January 2007 December 2006 November 2006 October 2006 September 2006 August 2006 July 2006 June 2006 May 2006 April 2006 March 2006 February 2006 January 2006 December 2005 November 2005 October 2005 September 2005 August 2005 July 2005 June 2005 May 2005 April 2005 March 2005 February 2005 January 2005 December 2004 November 2004 October 2004 September 2004 August 2004 July 2004 June 2004 May 2004 April 2004 March 2004 February 2004 January 2004
Extras
PDARSD Atom RSS 2.0 RSS 1.0
Credits
Our Blogroll
|