|
« Take the Global Test! | Main | Letters, Letters, We Love Letters! » October 03, 2004
Terrorists Building Dirty Bomb
Posted by Bill A Time magazine exclusive: London's Dirty-Bomb Plot A dirty bomb may not be as destructive as many people think, but the lasting stigma of a radioactive explosion in a dense urban area could be catastrophic news for the economies of places like London, NY and DC ... Posted by Bill at October 3, 2004 11:40 AM | TrackBack (3) CommentsJust a thought but... how many smoke detectors do you need for this crazy scheme? Posted by: Yogi at October 3, 2004 12:24 PM Posted by: Anachronda at October 3, 2004 12:30 PM How about a plot to MOAB Falluja? I gotcher dirty bomb RIGHT HERE!! Dan Posted by: Dan Patterson at October 3, 2004 12:47 PM You'd need a TON of smoke detectors to do any radiation damage. There's just microcuries of the stuff in an average smoke detector. (Remember, they are thrown in the TRASH by the thousands each year, and there's no problem with that.) And by the way, the isotope used, ironically enough, is Americium 241. Steve Bragg Posted by: Steve Bragg at October 3, 2004 01:15 PM Steve While I certainly believe you are right technically, the harm to the economy in any location that this might happen is comes perception. Recall the Tylenol scare of 1982. Posted by: Darleen at October 3, 2004 01:32 PM Oh durn...I really mangled my grammar in that post! (PIMF) apologies "the harm to the economy in any location where this might happen comes from perception, not actual physical harm." Posted by: Darleen at October 3, 2004 01:35 PM One would have thought that the sub-editors at Time's online division would know how to spell the preterite tense of 'to be'. Posted by: David Gillies at October 3, 2004 02:50 PM - actually there is some indication online that you'd need around 2000 units to build a creditable device.... - The real problem is there would be many more injuries from panicky reactions than the bomb itself.... - as Bill said its really more shock value than than anything..... Posted by: Hunter at October 3, 2004 06:52 PM Bill, Posted by: Tim Worstall at October 4, 2004 01:10 PM Bill, my apologies. Posted by: Tim Worstall at October 4, 2004 01:12 PM I heard it was a 'dirty sanchez' bomb, but my sources aren't that reliable. Posted by: Rusty Shackleford at October 4, 2004 03:43 PM 7221 http://harley-parts.ownsthis.com motorcycle parts harley parts harley davidson parts Posted by: motorcycle parts at October 10, 2004 12:29 PM |