|
« Take the Global Test! | Main | Letters, Letters, We Love Letters! » October 03, 2004
Terrorists Building Dirty Bomb
Posted by Bill A Time magazine exclusive: London's Dirty-Bomb Plot A dirty bomb may not be as destructive as many people think, but the lasting stigma of a radioactive explosion in a dense urban area could be catastrophic news for the economies of places like London, NY and DC ... Posted by Bill at October 3, 2004 11:40 AM | TrackBack (3) CommentsJust a thought but... how many smoke detectors do you need for this crazy scheme? Posted by: Yogi at October 3, 2004 12:24 PM Posted by: Anachronda at October 3, 2004 12:30 PM How about a plot to MOAB Falluja? I gotcher dirty bomb RIGHT HERE!! Dan Posted by: Dan Patterson at October 3, 2004 12:47 PM You'd need a TON of smoke detectors to do any radiation damage. There's just microcuries of the stuff in an average smoke detector. (Remember, they are thrown in the TRASH by the thousands each year, and there's no problem with that.) And by the way, the isotope used, ironically enough, is Americium 241. Steve Bragg Posted by: Steve Bragg at October 3, 2004 01:15 PM Steve While I certainly believe you are right technically, the harm to the economy in any location that this might happen is comes perception. Recall the Tylenol scare of 1982. Posted by: Darleen at October 3, 2004 01:32 PM Oh durn...I really mangled my grammar in that post! (PIMF) apologies "the harm to the economy in any location where this might happen comes from perception, not actual physical harm." Posted by: Darleen at October 3, 2004 01:35 PM One would have thought that the sub-editors at Time's online division would know how to spell the preterite tense of 'to be'. Posted by: David Gillies at October 3, 2004 02:50 PM - actually there is some indication online that you'd need around 2000 units to build a creditable device.... - The real problem is there would be many more injuries from panicky reactions than the bomb itself.... - as Bill said its really more shock value than than anything..... Posted by: Hunter at October 3, 2004 06:52 PM Bill, Posted by: Tim Worstall at October 4, 2004 01:10 PM Bill, my apologies. Posted by: Tim Worstall at October 4, 2004 01:12 PM I heard it was a 'dirty sanchez' bomb, but my sources aren't that reliable. Posted by: Rusty Shackleford at October 4, 2004 03:43 PM 7221 http://harley-parts.ownsthis.com motorcycle parts harley parts harley davidson parts Posted by: motorcycle parts at October 10, 2004 12:29 PM |
Feed Me, Seymour
bill *at* indcjournal *dot* com
Support Our Advertisers
Search
Archives
June 2008May 2008 April 2008 February 2008 January 2008 December 2007 November 2007 October 2007 September 2007 August 2007 July 2007 June 2007 May 2007 April 2007 March 2007 February 2007 January 2007 December 2006 November 2006 October 2006 September 2006 August 2006 July 2006 June 2006 May 2006 April 2006 March 2006 February 2006 January 2006 December 2005 November 2005 October 2005 September 2005 August 2005 July 2005 June 2005 May 2005 April 2005 March 2005 February 2005 January 2005 December 2004 November 2004 October 2004 September 2004 August 2004 July 2004 June 2004 May 2004 April 2004 March 2004 February 2004 January 2004
Extras
PDARSD Atom RSS 2.0 RSS 1.0
Credits
Our Blogroll
|