|
« CBS Affiliate Rebels | Main | Is Anyone Paying Attention » October 02, 2004
FOX WATCH
Posted by Bill
As you've probably heard, FOX News just created its own news scandal by posting politically detrimental fake quotes ascribed to Kerry in a story that's featured on their web site. The story has since been corrected with the following note: Earlier Friday, FOXNews.com posted an item purporting to contain quotations from Kerry. The item was based on a reporter’s partial script that had been written in jest and should not have been posted or broadcast. We regret the error, which occurred because of fatigue and bad judgment, not malice. I'd like to be clear that I'm not ignoring Fox's error, rather working on some detailed analysis and conclusions about this incident that are held up in the primary research stage. A quick initial analysis: 1. Mistakes like this are never completely innocuous; an item posted on the web site of a large news organization will always reach a significant amount of readers before any distortion is pulled and corrected, and a correction never guarantees reversal of all of the initial impressions. 2. Fox's mini-scandal is much more analogous to "fake boos from the AP," rather than "fake memos at CBS." Even the AP analogy is inappropriate however, because the Associated Press serves as a wire service that widely disseminated the information before the removal of the fabricated portions, and they never apologized for the fabrication. 3. Fox News very quickly reacted by pulling the quotes and partially explaining and apologizing for the error. That being said, some of Josh Marshall's remaining questions have validity, and a transparent news organization should feel comfortable providing answers. Journalists make mistakes, and it's the combination of the depth of the mistake and the reaction to criticism that determines the damage to the organization's credibility. FOX's inexplicable and ludicrous initial gaffe aside, their damage control and accountability efforts have been quick and competent, if not exhaustive. There are still some questions that both FOX and the AP should answer about the processes that govern how organizations collect and finally publish information. Requisite snarky blogger take: don't these people have editors? I'd also like to direct some kudos and ridicule towards Marshall, who spotted the fabricated quotes and successfully held Fox to account: 1. Good job. There is absolutely nothing wrong with a media watchdog that focuses on errors and dishonesty that harm his political candidate. As Dan Rather may or may not have learned by now, motivation does not supercede truth, and all media needs to be called on destructive bias. 2. But please spare us this line: "I don't expect much from this Republican operation." Last I heard, Marshall was working on a canned anti-Bush story with producers at CBS News, and was also fed appropriately parroted information about the National Guard story before it's air date. Considering his convivial ties with Sid Blumenthal and other Dem operatives, his specifically partisan scorn for FOX news barely passes the laugh (out loud) test: Hilarious in retrospect, but suspicious. Marshall obviously had an inside scoop, it appears. Even his colleague at Slate, Mickey Kaus, has referred to Marshall as a “puppet” of the notorious Sidney Blumenthal, the Clintonista long considered - and not without warrant - the architect of the most vicious smears against his opponents. In addition, his ridiculously self-assured calls for Carl Cameron's punishment are unbelievable in light of his refusal to demand a bloody accounting for the exponentially worse National Guard fiasco perpetrated by his friends at CBS. Practicing intellectual dishonesty from a glass house is never a bright idea. UPDATE: Tim Blair reviews Marshall's prioritization in, uh, gentle tones. UPDATE: Pennywit has a great comment that could very well explain the incident: I know exactly how something like this could happen. Journalists are a very cynical bunch. Every so often, one of them writes something that is meant as a joke or creates dummy text for a layout and throws something outrageous into it. Journalists do this all the time, and their editors constantly lecture them not to do this because there's always a chance the joke will make it into the paper. Fox News is a case in point. UPDATE: And then there's this oldie-but-goodie: Following the Republican National Convention (I believe it was the day after), I went to Josh’s Talking Points blog, where I found a post calling Arnold Schwarzenegger a liar for saying that he remembered seeing the Nixon-Humphrey debate in 1968. Josh did a “gotcha” by pointing out that there was no such debate. I had watched Arnold's speech and was pretty sure that's not what he had said, so off I went to review the speech. Sure enough, Arnold hadn’t said anything about a debate; he simply said he remembered watching the presidential race on TV. So back I went to Josh's blog to leave a comment (it turns out Josh doesn't do comments) only to find that the post had been removed. Poof! Making a mistake is fine, but taking responsibility is key. If Marshall actually apologized or retracted, feel free to let me know.
Posted by Bill at October 2, 2004 09:39 PM | TrackBack (3) CommentsJust like Rather, Carl Cameron needs to go. I am very disappointed. Posted by: Jim at October 2, 2004 10:45 PM I disagree. If Cameron's fake quotes were posted due to an error and not malice, such a reaction is ridiculously extreme. It's also important to consider that if Rather would have pulled the Guard story and apologized with the speed that FOX News displayed in this instance, it certainly wouldn't have blossomed into the horrible scandal for CBS that it is today. Mistakes happen. The motivation and reason for the mistakes, as well as how they are handled, determine the appropriate damage and responsiblity. Posted by: Bill from INDC at October 2, 2004 10:51 PM Carl Cameron has always been the weak link in Fox's political team. Der Schirkmeister uber alles. This fight we're waging against some serious messing around with the election can't stand hits. Eject Carl. Now. And make Jim Angle work that much harder. Posted by: Terry Mann at October 2, 2004 10:52 PM Big whoop. They didn't exactly accuse Kerry of anything, and frankly I don't see how anyone could have taken this seriously in the first place. It's obvious satire. "My cuticles looked great!? Come on. Posted by: TallDave at October 2, 2004 11:20 PM This is much ado about nothing. Fox News fessed up...end of story. Plus,the story obviously was some sort of joke...I don't think many people could have taken it seriously anyway... Posted by: Another Thought at October 2, 2004 11:34 PM As usual, I agree with Bill (which is the link section of my blog only has one blog in it). I anxiously await the detailed analysis being prepared. I think an obvious difference between this story and the CBS story is criminal activity. The CBS forgery and the Washington office break-in are of Watergate proportions. If there is some kind of train-wreck and Kerry wins the campaign (A big IF I know), the fun part will be impeaching him two months later. Posted by: Thad O at October 2, 2004 11:45 PM I don't really remember which guy is cameron, but I did actually read the quotes. They are fairly obviously an attempt at humor, and not that great of an attempt. They are not forgeries of quotes by any means. I just don't understand how they got published. Like Bill said don't they have editors? Frankly if anyone should be fired its the editor. But if every journalist got fired over dumb things like this there'd be no professional journalists. Which might be good ;) I'm actually encouraged by Fox's response. It was quick and they took the blame. Pretty responsible. Fox and MSNBC seem to be the only networks that pay any attention to blogs. Posted by: ctob at October 2, 2004 11:49 PM It was quick and they took the blame. Pretty responsible. Almost miraculous by the poor standards of their competitors. Posted by: Bill from INDC at October 3, 2004 12:00 AM Fox did a good job by owning up to this quickly, but this just is not the time for such goof up. Cameron has done nothing more than give the pro Kerry bottom dwellers another talking point. Cameron should go. Posted by: Jim at October 3, 2004 12:15 AM Well, it's unrealistic and it's not going to happen, Jim. Stop to consider the fact that Rather will likely survive, at least for a graceful ease out. I also think that the idea that Cameron should be fired for having joke notes mistakenly posted is bizarrely harsh, to be frank. Posted by: Bill from INDC at October 3, 2004 12:18 AM Personally, I think they got hacked. Posted by: TC-LeatherPenguin at October 3, 2004 12:19 AM Frank? I thought you were Bill. :) Posted by: Jim at October 3, 2004 12:19 AM Oh, I think this was obviously satire and the liberal MSM might just benefit from this relatively harmless reminder that their candidate is not totally immune from smears of a far greater nature such as the DNCBS forgery and the NYT just happening to get the quote exactly wrong so much of the time. Maybe if some major news outlet began to return the favor, the lib of the MSM would be a bit more careful themselves lest their darling Kerry be tarnished in the same manner they do not hesitate to use against Bush. Not as though they got "imminent threat" wrong as did so many or forged documents to smear Kerry's nail polish. This is minor compared to the trash they have thrown and their whining about it is so typical. Tough! People/glass houses. Maybe a couple of far more serious "errors" as they continually make concerning Bush might cause them to actually check a few facts once in a while. Nah, we are not dealing with anything like honest and truthful journalism in MSM but at least maybe they will realize it can be done back in return for their own misdeeds. Then just issue an OOPS! And on to the next whopper. I wish I could be outraged but considering the behavior of the MSM in acting as a propaganda branch of the DNC in this election, it's time to fight fire with fire and this could serve as a warning shot to stop with the lying about Bush and his supporters and even all these big, secret plans that do not exist. When dealing with dishonorable journalists, perhaps they can only be shown by example how it feels since they have no integrity for a moral compass. Posted by: Amelia at October 3, 2004 07:49 AM I know exactly how something like this could happen. Journalists are a very cynical bunch. Every so often, one of them writes something that is meant as a joke or creates dummy text for a layout and throws something outrageous into it. Journalists do this all the time, and their editors constantly lecture them not to do this because there's always a chance the joke will make it into the paper. Fox News is a case in point. There was also an incident some years back in which a college paper accidentally called a university official the "director of butt-licking." How did that happen? It has to do with pulled quotes. Quark XPress had a feature called a library. You would store common layout elements, like pulled quotes, headline and story combos, and other items in that library and stick them on the layout when you want to use them. In smart newsrooms, the dummy items, as they're called, contain dummy copy with Latin words or lots of Xs. The rationale for this is twofold: 1. You're more likely to catch a layout full of Xxxx's or nonsense words if you're checking it before it goes out; and, 2. If nonsense words make it out, you look like an idiot, but at least you don't libel anybody. At Fox News, the "director of buttlicking" copy got out, and somebody needs to remind the reporter not to use THE LIVE SYSTEM to write his jokes. --|PW|-- Posted by: pennywit at October 3, 2004 08:34 AM I didn't even realize this happened. I don't know that anyone should be fired over it, but Cameron should certainly be called on the carpet over it. AT least Fox had the guts to post a retraction and an apology. Posted by: Just Me at October 3, 2004 08:42 AM If you want examples of how the media handles Bush, read some of the pool reports that Wonkette has published. Consider this bit, written by a New York Times reporter: By the time your pool caught up with POTUS, the Bush Brothers -- Jeb in a khaki shirt, his brother in a light blue checked shirt -- were loading water and bags of ice into cars, leaning into the passenger seats to shake hands. Most of the conversation was out of the earshot of your poolers. But the lineup of cars looked a little like a Saturday afternoon line at Safeway to pickup groceries, with the governor of Florida and the POTUS as the bag-loaders -- only with more smiles. As a photo-op it was perfect -- the president was signing $2 billion of aid in the morning, then delivering the goods by lunchtime. You'd never know an election was eight weeks away. Posted by: Bill Peschel at October 3, 2004 03:33 PM Nobody has to make up stupid quotes for John Kerry. Just publish everything he says and the stupidity will follow naturally. Posted by: Chris W. at October 3, 2004 04:04 PM Two Points... 1) With regard to the Kerry-caught-cheating tempest in a teapot, an examinaiton of the tape indicates Dumbya unfolding paper at his podium at Sen. Kerry approaches his podium. 2) This thread's reaction to Carl Cameron's z-grade literary effort is instructive. Despite all of Faux News' protestations to the contrary, what you folk write indicates the degree to which Faux News is not a journalistic entity, at all, but, rather, an extension of the Right Wing/Republican Party propaganda machine. Michael Dodson Posted by: Michael Dodson at October 3, 2004 05:07 PM Around Chicago, one of the suburban papers once published a front-page picture captioned "A whole shitload of snow fell on Chicago yesterday". The caption writer thought someone would catch it and it wouldn't get published. He was wrong. I believe the situation was similar with the Manchester Union-Leader (I may have just botched the name of the paper -- I'm lazy) when it published the story on one of Carter's speeches headlined "More Mush from the Wimp". Posted by: Bill Roper at October 4, 2004 12:04 AM 3115 http://harley-parts.ownsthis.com motorcycle parts harley parts harley davidson parts Posted by: harley davidson parts at October 10, 2004 04:56 PM |
-
av
Search
Archives
June 2008May 2008 April 2008 February 2008 January 2008 December 2007 November 2007 October 2007 September 2007 August 2007 July 2007 June 2007 May 2007 April 2007 March 2007 February 2007 January 2007 December 2006 November 2006 October 2006 September 2006 August 2006 July 2006 June 2006 May 2006 April 2006 March 2006 February 2006 January 2006 December 2005 November 2005 October 2005 September 2005 August 2005 July 2005 June 2005 May 2005 April 2005 March 2005 February 2005 January 2005 December 2004 November 2004 October 2004 September 2004 August 2004 July 2004 June 2004 May 2004 April 2004 March 2004 February 2004 January 2004
Extras
PDARSD Atom RSS 2.0 RSS 1.0
Credits
Our Blogroll
|