As I opined earlier this morning, Kurtz got one thing wrong in his Post article. He implies that Rather's alleged history of left-wing bias is what has roused the ire of the blogosphere.

I hadn't watched CBS News in years, and didn't think ill of Dan before this -- I didn't think of him at all.

I think a lot of people are missing the point about the fact that the document originated at Kinko's. All it proves is that a document was FAXED from kinko's, not written there. You can scan or copy the original, then either fax the digitized, scanned copy or run it mechanically through a fax machine. The origin of the document may be still in dispute, but being sent from kinko's doesnt discredit it. Do you think the source would have handed over the original copy! That may also explain why some of the experts' including that of Mr. Bouffard's, may not have definitively ruled out the IBM Selectric Composer, available at that time and, according to Bouffard, capable of creating the document in question.

Um, ed, no one is suggesting that Kinkos has anything to do with the documents veracity. it's only useful in tracking down who sent it.