INDC Journal

« Bracing for the Hit | Main | Pounding Some Paxil »

May 26, 2004
Why I Will NOT Vote for John Kerry, The Vietnam Angle

Posted by Bill

I defended John Kerry from those that wished to cheaply malign his Vietnam Service, specifically those that did not serve, but I always thought that the focus on his postwar activity was perfectly legitimate criticism. Realistically, the hyperbole that he employed to paint a picture of ubiquitous atrocities committed by US troops during wartime is indicative of a deeply self-serving, irresponsible and manipulative personality. In my eyes, unless his accusations were true or he issues an appropriately grave apology, such behavior invalidates Kerry as a respectable candidate for the presidency.

Yesterday I finally got around to watching the news conference held by Swift Boat Veterans for Truth, a group of veterans that served with Kerry and are dedicated to preventing his ascendance to the Presidency. Perhaps the most notable excerpt occurs 20 minutes into the video:

My name is Joe Ponder, I live in Keystone Heights, FL. I served in Coastal Divisions 11 and 13 from July of '68 until I was wounded in a Sealords combat mission in Nov of 1968 on the Bo De River, During this time Senator Kerry was in our unit.

I'd prefer not to be here, but I feel that it is my duty to be here and Stand with this association and explain why I signed this letter. My family feels I need to be here. It's my duty to be here. My daughters and my wife wanted to know ... (pause, chokes up) if I took part in the atrocities described. I do not believe the things that are described happened.

There are more, many, many more unequivocal indictments of John Kerry's character from some of the men that knew him best. I challenge any reasonable Kerry supporter to sit through the entire video and not come away with serious reservations about their candidate. I also find it somewhat shocking that I have never heard any of these sound bites replayed in the mainstream media. These are dramatic sentiments expressed by serious and credible men.

If you're on the fence in this election and you have the time, watch it. And ask yourself: how would a man as cynical as the young John Kerry run the United States today? Is he largely the same person? What do his personal ambitions and tactics of 30 years ago say about the value he places on his personal political survival and success today? And how will this impact the decisions that he makes in a time of war?

These are very legitimate questions.

Posted by Bill at May 26, 2004 11:15 AM | TrackBack (3)

Comments

Let us not forget his support for Daniel Ortega and the Sandanistas.

Posted by: Jason Bontrager at May 26, 2004 02:05 PM

Thanks for posting this. I took the time to watch the whole video it was something. (BTW your link to the video is only for part one, didn't know if you were aware of this or not.)

Just one more reason why "the good senator from MA" isn't fit to empty the ash trays in the oval office, much less occupy it.

Posted by: Guy S. at May 26, 2004 02:20 PM

You are surprised that none of this turned up in the mainstream media? I am not in any way surprised. In fact I would have been shocked if it was shown on the mainstream media. Even if it was discussed the headline would be
"Conservative Veterans Group attacks Kerry's courageous service in Vietnam."


Posted by: Big E at May 26, 2004 04:57 PM

I commented a week or two ago that Kerry was a classic "one-cookie" kid. There was a famed experiment years ago where kids were given a cookie and told that they could eat the cookie now, but if they did that was it. If they waited for just five minutes before eating, they would get a second cookie. Then they studied the kids who took the cookie and ate it immediately, and they had all sorts of problems disproportionately like dropping out, getting (or getting someone else) pregnant, etc. Behaviors that appeared to be related to the same issue as eating the cookie; the unwillingness to put off current pleasure for greater longer term gain.

Kerry took a bite of the cookie when he came back from Vietnam, and it got him famous--on the Dick Cavett show and Meet the Press. But it didn't help him get what he wanted, which was a job in Congress. Later, he started his cookie business by stealing the plans from a franchisor; he literally ate the cookie that time. And all his ridiculous flip-flopping is classic one-cookie behavior. It solves the problem for now at the cost of the future.

Posted by: Brainster at May 27, 2004 01:45 AM

Disclaimer: I was never in shooting combat. This notion is based on my observations of people who were, and the parallel observations of people who were in combat of one another.

John Kerry's case seems absolutely simple to me.

There is a particular class of attitudes that, in former times, were encouraged or even sought out by military services, including Americans, but which are nowadays strongly deprecated as "unprofessional." It is perhaps one of the few points of agreement between the military and the Left: Rambo is not useful as a soldier in today's American military.

In the cases I've observed, it works like this. Combat is scary. One's first experience of combat is hyper-scary, and one's response to that first experience is a very revealing look at one's underlying personality.

One of the possible responses is "attack back." Hearing the first zing becomes a license to go -- not berserk, precisely, although some do, but to respond with literally everything available, whether or not such response is appropriate in that particular situation. People who respond that way later, in my observations, fall into categories categorized by two extremes: the guy who loads himself down with everything he can get issued or scrounge, and responds to any least perception of attack with everything in his personal arsenal; and the guy who comes down off the adrenalin high and is deeply ashamed of his behavior, and very often never fires another effective shot, although he may continue to carry the weapon and even display competence with it when tested outside combat.

Neither of those types is useful to a modern professional military, who may have to consider that civilians, churches, valuable objects, etc. may be in the background when Rambo goes off, and who need every round available downrange when the shit hits the fan and can't depend on Mr. Sorry to contribute to that.

Kerry seems, from the description of his actions, like a type A, and the things I've seen from his former commanders confirm that in my mind. It's a bit ironic. The Left, whose favorite caricature of soldiers is the Rambo-type they disparage, has nominated Rambo for the highest office in the land, and the Right (whom the left assumes approve of Rambo) are the ones dissing him.

Look at the picture. Stripped to the waist, a bandolier of ammo over his shoulder, smiling with the rifle butt in his waist. Rambo. He's supposed to be commanding the boat, dammit, not blowing away VC -- that's what enlisted gunners are for. Kerry abandoned his command responsibilities to perform, badly, the duties of an E3 machine gunner. And the Democrats want him for President?

Ewwww.

Regards,
Ric

Posted by: Ric Locke at May 27, 2004 11:24 PM

not bad

Posted by: paris hilton topless at July 2, 2004 08:17 AM