INDC Journal

« Take Heart, Blogosphere | Main | Spring for The Penthouse »

April 22, 2004
Look, I Think That John Kerry is a Jackass, But ...

Posted by Bill

... I don't think that it's a wise or particularly ethical angle to call into question his Vietnam service.

* I don't care if he received a Purple Heart for a wicked case of Hemorrhoids.
* I don't care if the VC that he shot for his Silver Star only had one leg and suffered from early-onset rheumatoid arthritis.
* I don't care if his swift-boat had a mini-bar.
* I don't care!

And neither should you, at the very least not if you haven't killed anyone for your country in the past 35 years or so. Calling into question Kerry's military performance, when he very likely had the option to avoid the war altogether, is just fucking childish, people; more childish than parsing Dubya's National Guard Service. And like the Dems' idiotic charges of AWOL, these attacks are just as likely to blow up in Republican faces when the American public becomes sufficiently revulsed.

In contrast, it's much more relevant to discuss Kerry's outrageous post-Vietnam rhetoric; the impact that his efforts had on the soldiers that were still embroiled in the fighting.

Don't lower your standards in the name of rabid partisanship. If Bush had gone to Vietnam and was facing similar accusations under similar circumstances, you'd be blowing a gasket right now. Cut it out.

Posted by Bill at April 22, 2004 10:53 AM | TrackBack (1)

Comments

Hey, he released his records. That settles it for me, since I don't know enough to parse those records for what they really mean. However, Kerry made his record part of his campaign platform, and then didn't want to release those records, which made the whole thing worse. If he had released on Day 1 and said "this is the paperwork for my military career," nobody would have given it a second glance; instead, he was rude and snobby about it. It's more an indication of bad campaign management than of anything he did 30 years ago.

The VVAW stuff is, I agree, a far more legitimate issue. After all, most of the military records are other people's words about Kerry. The VVAW stuff is direct from the Senator's mouth.

Posted by: Dr. Kate at April 22, 2004 11:35 AM

I don't have a problem with people demanding that he release his records either ... I do have a problem with people that have never been shot at jumping on the bandwagon and calling him a coward, or a wimp. That angle will be highly counterproductive with much of America, in addition to being hypocritical ...

Posted by: Bill from INDC Journal at April 22, 2004 11:42 AM

Even if all this hubbub about Kerry's Purple Hearts were true, at least we don't have to worry about him following in the footsteps of Admiral Boorda. Instead of saying why I believe this, I'll just leave it at that.

Posted by: Boyd at April 22, 2004 11:42 AM

Exactly! I don't question his record of service. I DO question his VVAW record, though.

Does anyone know when Kerry was released from the Navy (not including Fleet Reserve time)? Reason is that if he took up the VVAW rhetoric while still on duty, that would be considered treason in my book (not that any of his latest rhetoric and voting record isn't treasonous).

Wonder if Fat Northern Bastard (Michael Moore) would ever do a faux-cumentary on the VVAW, Kerry, Fonda, Sutherland and FTA?

Posted by: El Jefe at April 22, 2004 01:01 PM

I think you make an excellent point here.

The fact is that John Kerry did receive those medals and that happens usually upon recommendation and review. He did not receive those medals -- any of them -- by virtue of his charismatic personality.

His rhetoric though is as fair a game as his voting record.

And what DID happen to all of that black hair?

Posted by: Mickey Chandler at April 22, 2004 01:01 PM

Oh c'mon! alot of people were more critical than me.

Posted by: Tom Alday at April 22, 2004 03:07 PM

I know, I just came up with you first on google. Congratulations!

Feel free to choose a post during your visit and Fisk at will.

Posted by: Bill from INDC Journal at April 22, 2004 03:15 PM

Here we are in complete aggreement. The White House attempts to turn this into an issue is a serious misfire on their part.

Posted by: Don Myers at April 23, 2004 10:29 AM

Thw country still awaits info on the most disputed of the purple hearts, the first one.

Posted by: Tom Alday at April 23, 2004 12:19 PM

i just want to point out that while it isn't a really big deal to *me* what john kerry did or did not do for his purple hearts (i'm not voting on vietnam) it probably is a huge deal to the folks he was over there with.

giving the benefit of the doubt to the accusers for the moment, how would you, a vietnam vet that fought, killed, and bled, and did it all without whining, saw some pansy rich boy getting b.s. medals and getting out of country for some half-assed made up injury. then, to add salt to that wound, there's the winter soldier trials, and, for some gasoline on it, 35 years later here's the same guy claiming he's a war hero in a presidental election. sorry for the harsh language, i'm just trying to put it in the perspective of where they would be looking at it from

i'm not saying either way that they're right or he's right, or that it's even a huge deal relative to the election, but i saw guys do stuff like this to get out of iraq, i don't hold it against them unless they come back and try to pull something like this. that would seriously jerk my chain

er...sorry for the long post

Posted by: francis the great at April 23, 2004 08:46 PM

No apologies necessary Francis, and bad language is always acceptable here at INDC. You make a good point - but I did qualify my criticism with the fact that Vietnam War veterans that saw combat can complain to their heart's content. As a general Republican talking point, however, maligning Kerry's war record is suicide.

Posted by: Bill from INDC at April 24, 2004 01:50 AM

way late here, but agreed...i don't know if anything has come from the white house on this or any official republican outlet, but trying to make political hay from this would just make them look petty. if it makes major news sources, it's worth talking about out there maybe, but isn't suitable for a mention as a serious political point. or as a reason to vote for or against kerry

Posted by: francis the great at April 24, 2004 10:35 PM

Posted by: Melissa Dougherty at May 6, 2004 03:45 PM